Keywords
DISPUTE RESOLUTIONFOOD POLICY RESEARCH
SOCIAL INEQUALITY
FACTOR ENDOWMENTS
NET INCOME
DIFFERENCES IN INCOME
DISTRIBUTIONAL CONFLICTS
CONCENTRATION COEFFICIENTS
COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
INCOME GROWTH
ECONOMIC GROWTH
LAND OWNERSHIP
LABOR FORCE
UNEQUAL ACCESS
INCOME QUINTILES
ACCOUNTABILITY
EQUAL COUNTRIES
INSURANCE
REDISTRIBUTION
SOCIAL FUNDS
SOCIAL INEQUITY
ACCESS TO JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
INCOME ELASTICITY
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
INCOME TRANSFERS
ACCESS TO ENERGY
ELASTICITY OF POVERTY
ECONOMIC MECHANISMS
ACCESS TO EDUCATION
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
POVERTY INCIDENCE
TAX RATES
CRONY BIAS
REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES
FAIRNESS & IMPARTIALITY
LABOR MARKET
POLITICAL EQUILIBRIUM
MEAN INCOMES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS
POVERTY REDUCTION
SOCIAL ACTION
SOCIAL EXCLUSION
LABOR INCOME
TAX COMPLIANCE
REAL PER CAPITA INCOME
INCOME INEQUALITIES
PENSIONS
ACCESS TO WATER SOURCES
ACCESS TO SAFE WATER
SOCIAL SECURITY
TARGETING
WAGES
SOCIAL CAPITAL
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE
ACCESS TO PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
WELL-BEING
TAXATION
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
HUMAN RIGHTS
MEAN INCOME
PERSONAL INCOME TAXES
ACCESS TO COURTS
YOUTH
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
ACCESS TO FINANCIAL SERVICES
CRISES
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
SOCIAL CONDITIONS
MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
GINI COEFFICIENT
LITERACY RATES
ACCESS TO SECONDARY EDUCATION
PRIMARY EDUCATION
PER CAPITA INCOME
DATA SETS
POLITICAL LEADERSHIP
RULE OF LAW
INCOME
WEALTH INEQUALITIES
DEMOCRACY
INEQUALITY MEASURES
ACCESS TO DRINKING WATER
PROPERTY RIGHTS
SUBNATIONAL LEVELS
INCOME DIFFERENCES
PERSONAL INCOME
CRIME
LAND INEQUALITY
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
SOCIAL INCLUSION
REGRESSIVE TRANSFERS
INEQUALITY REDUCTION
POLITICAL INFLUENCE
LAND USE
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
POLITICAL FINANCING
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
GROUP INEQUALITY
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
ACCESS TO CREDIT
MORTALITY RATES
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
HUMAN CAPITAL
ELASTICITY
ECONOMISTS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
ACCESS TO LAND
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
MACROECONOMIC POLICY
POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY
POLICY RESEARCH
TAX REVENUE
INEQUALITY
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT
UNEMPLOYMENT
INEQUALITY
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION
TAX REVENUES
CROSS-COUNTRY REGRESSION
ELASTICITIES
SOCIAL SAFETY NETS ACCESS TO SERVICES
POLICY REFORMS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMS
LABOR MARKET POLICIES
ACCESS TO PRIMARY EDUCATION
COUNTRIES MUST
PRICE CHANGES
NATURAL RESOURCES
PROPERTY RIGHTS
GDP
LABOR MARKETS
SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS
INCOME TRANSFER PROGRAMS
HIGH INEQUALITY
PUBLIC SPENDING
CASH TRANSFERS
CRONY
POOR
PUBLIC TRANSFERS
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
INCOME INEQUALITY
SOCIAL CHANGE
WAGE DIFFERENTIALS
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
CITIZENS
SOCIAL SPENDING
AGGREGATE INCOME
MEASURING INEQUALITY
INCOME SHARES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15009Abstract
With the exception of Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean has been one of the regions of the world with the greatest inequality. This report explores why the region suffers from such persistent inequality, identifies how it hampers development, and suggests ways to achieve greater equity in the distribution of wealth, incomes and opportunities. The study draws on data from 20 countries based on household surveys covering 3.6 million people, and reviews extensive economic, sociological and political science studies on inequality in Latin America. To address the deep historical roots of inequality in Latin America, and the powerful contemporary economic, political and social mechanisms that sustain it, Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean outlines four broad areas for action by governments and civil society groups to break this destructive pattern: 1) Build more open political and social institutions, that allow the poor and historically subordinate groups to gain a greater share of agency, voice and power in society. 2) Ensure that economic institutions and policies seek greater equity, through sound macroeconomic management and equitable, efficient crisis resolution institutions, that avoid the large regressive redistributions that occur during crises, and that allow for saving in good times to enhance access by the poor to social safety nets in bad times. 3) Increase access by the poor to high-quality public services, especially education, health, water and electricity, as well as access to farmland and the rural services. Protect and enforce the property rights of the urban poor. 4) Reform income transfer programs so that they reach the poorest families.Date
2013-08-12Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15009http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15009
0-8213-5665-8
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Exiting Belindia? Lesson from the Recent Decline in Income Inequality in BrazilLopez-Calva, Luis F.; Rocha, Sonia (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012)After decades of persistent disparities,
 inequality in Brazil has fallen steadily over the last
 fifteen years. This robust rate of decline has surpassed the
 pace of the Latin American region as a whole, and is taking
 place as inequality rises in several rapid-growth emerging
 economies in other regions. This document examines the
 recent trend in income inequality in Brazil, its key policy
 drivers and some of the challenges ahead. It aims at
 capturing some of the lessons behind Brazil?s experience to
 share with other economies in the region and beyond.
-
How Can Safety Nets Contribute to Economic Growth?Alderman, Harold; Yemtsov, Ruslan (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-09-04)The paper provides an up-to date and
 selective review of the literature on how social safety nets
 contribute to growth. The evidence is carefully chosen to
 show how safety nets have the potential to overcome
 constraints on growth linked to market failures, and is
 organized into 4 distinct pathways: i) encouraging asset
 accumulation by changing incentives and by addressing
 imperfections in financial markets caused by constraints in
 obtaining credit, and from information asymmetries;
 overcoming such failures helps households to invest into
 their human capital or productive assets; ii) failures in
 insurance markets especially in low income setting; safety
 nets are assisting in managing risk both ex post and ex
 ante; iii) safety nets are overcoming failure to create
 assets and other local economy complementary factors to
 household-level investments; iv) safety nets are shown to
 relax political constraints on policy. Safety nets have a
 dual objective of directly alleviating poverty through
 transfers to the poor and of triggering higher growth for
 the poor. However, the trade-off between the dual objectives
 of equity and growth is not eliminated by the potential for
 productive safety nets; this remains critical for designing
 social policies.
-
Inequality of Opportunity and Economic Growth : A Cross-Country AnalysisLugo, Maria Ana; Ozler, Berk; Ferreira, Francisco H.G.; Lakner, Christoph (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-06)Income differences arise from many
 sources. While some kinds of inequality, caused by effort
 differences, might be associated with faster economic
 growth, other kinds, arising from unequal opportunities for
 investment, might be detrimental to economic progress. This
 study uses two new metadata sets, consisting of 118
 household surveys and 134 Demographic and Health Surveys, to
 revisit the question of whether inequality is associated
 with economic growth and, in particular, to examine whether
 inequality of opportunity -- driven by circumstances at
 birth -- has a negative effect on subsequent growth. The
 results are suggestive but not robust: while overall income
 inequality is generally negatively associated with growth in
 the household survey sample, we find no evidence that this
 is due to the component associated with unequal
 opportunities. In the Demographic and Health Surveys sample,
 both overall wealth inequality and inequality of opportunity
 have a negative effect on growth in some of the preferred
 specifications, but the results are not robust to relatively
 minor changes. On balance, although the results are
 suggestive of a negative association between inequality and
 growth, the data do not permit robust conclusions as to
 whether inequality of opportunity is bad for growth.