Author(s)
Haisley, Stephane JacksonKeywords
FEMALEINTERNATIONAL LEVEL
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC HEALTH
JUDGES
PRISON
NATIONS
EXTRADITION
IMPRISONMENT
DRUG ADDICTION
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
DRUGS
CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
SENTENCING
DEPENDENCE
PROSECUTORS
ATTORNEYS
SOCIAL SERVICES
IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION
LAWYERS
CRIMINAL OFFENDERS
DRUG DEPENDENT
CRIMINAL CASES
CRIMINAL LAW
LAWYER
INJURIES
PERPETRATORS
CRIMINAL COURT
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
CONVICTION
ADDICTIONS
LITERACY
BOUNDARIES
DETENTION
ALCOHOL
RULE OF LAW
ROADS
OFFENCES
DEFENCE
LEGAL EDUCATION
CRIME
DRUG USE
JUSTICES
CONSENT
SOCIAL REINTEGRATION
CRIMINAL
EMPOWERMENT
NARCOTICS
SUBSTANCE DEPENDENCY
DUE PROCESS
OFFENSES
PEACE
LEGISLATION
PUBLIC OFFICER
PROSECUTOR
JAIL
CRIMINALS
TRIALS
MENTAL HEALTH
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
TRIAL
GRAVE
HOME
DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT
OFFENDERS
MINISTER
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
SANCTIONS
RECONSTRUCTION
PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS
POLICE
LEGAL STATUS
JUDGE
CRIME PREVENTION
CRIME REDUCTION
DRUG DEPENDENCY
ETHICS
ILLICIT DRUGS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
MEETINGS
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
SMOKING
ALCOHOL USE
DRUG COURTS
JUDICIAL PROCESS
PROSECUTION
CANNABIS
PROBATION OFFICERS
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
DRUG ABUSE
DRUG COURT
HOMELESSNESS
WILL
DRUG
CRIMINAL ACTS
JAILS
PROSECUTIONS
PROBATION
CRIMINALITY
WOMAN
JURISDICTION
BAIL
INTERNATIONAL BANK
POLITICAL WILL
PARENTS
DRUG ADDICT
MEETING
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
COCAINE
CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES
VIOLENCE
CONFIDENCE
POLICE OFFICERS
THIEVES
PRISONS
OFFENDER
PUBLIC AWARENESS
LIBERTY
REHABILITATION
RESIDENCE
CHILD WELFARE
NARCOTIC DRUGS
ADVOCACY
VICTIMS
POLICE OFFICER
CASE LAW
OFFENSE
WAR
CONVICTIONS
EU
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
LEGAL PROCEDURES
NARCOTIC
SEX
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
INCARCERATION
HEROIN
FAMILIES
PILOT PROJECT
CRIMES
MARIJUANA
CONFLICT
MEDICAL CARE
CURFEW
DRUG TRAFFICKING
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16609Abstract
The Drug Treatment Court (DTC) model was conceived out of the need to solve the numerous and intractable problems that drug related cases create for court systems. A DTC is generally seen as a court that deals specifically with offenders who have committed offenses while under the influence of drugs and provides an alternative to incarceration. DTCs make use of a multidisciplinary team involving judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, probation officers, treatment providers, police officers, and educational and vocational experts. The criminal justice and health service systems join to provide drug-dependent offenders with the mechanisms to recover from drug addiction and lead a productive and crime-free life. The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of DTCs. After providing an overview of the origins of the DTC, looking at its roots in the United States and Canada, the paper examines the foundation and present-day experiences of DTCs in Jamaica. It also refers to some efforts among various countries in the Western Hemisphere to monitor DTCs and evaluate their effectiveness. The paper concludes with a return to the achievements of DTCs in Jamaica and a brief look at the future of the DTC program worldwide.Date
2013-01Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16609http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16609
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
In Search of Success : Case Studies in Justice Sector Development in Sub-Saharan AfricaWalsh, Barry (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID) and other donors have long been engaged in legal and judicial reform in sub-Saharan Africa in such areas as legal drafting, strengthening court administration, judicial training, and the empowerment of citizens through a better understanding of the legal system. This has often been done on an ad hoc basis with only limited review of other reform efforts in the region. In order to foster a more responsive approach to justice sector development programs, a collection of case studies was commissioned. One of the more daunting tasks was identifying notable justice sector developments or reforms, which offered specific impacts and which could be examined through both a desk review and field research. Independent of the funding source, the evidence base was not only limited but revealed a need for donors themselves to invest in better data collection, which could then be analyzed and measured against benchmarks or objectives such as improved access to justice. There is a significant need to review and learn from experiences, including controversial ones, in Africa's justice sectors. These case studies are not homogenous largely because their subjects vary and span a wide array of developments that reflect the realities of the region. Each story stands alone and is in no particular order. In the final chapter, the conclusions offered in each story are digested into ideas for future actions. The collection also represents a modest range of stories and it is to be hoped that other cases will be identified and shared. A comparison of experiences of sector-wide programs (SWAPs), for example, could help both donors and governments enhance socio-economic impact. It should be noted that the emphasis in this report is on providing information about positive directions in justice sector development and the ways in which lessons learned might be applied to achieve greater impact in the future. The anticipated value of this collection is that some of the conclusions or actions may be taken up and used to contribute to improvements by those committed to improving the rule of law in sub-Saharan Africa and is in search of 'success'.
-
Commercial Court and Enforcement Assessment ToolGramckow, Heike; Ebeid, Omniah (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-04-06)An effective and efficient justice
 system is essential for sustained economic growth. In a
 well-functioning, independent, and efficient justice system,
 decisions are taken within a reasonable time and are
 predictably and effectively enforced, and individual rights,
 including property rights, are adequately protected. Among
 other objectives, the efficiency of the judicial system is
 important for creating a good business climate, attracting
 foreign direct investment, securing tax revenues, and
 supporting economic growth. Research has shown that weak
 contract enforcement, for example, raises the cost of
 borrowing and shortens loan maturities, with a resulting
 negative effect on investment and GDP. Weak court
 enforcement systems have also been linked to late payments,
 which can lead to liquidity issues for companies and
 increase insolvency. Since the publication of the World
 Bank’s World Development Report 2005, the importance of
 well-functioning courts to strengthening the investment
 climate and ultimately to reducing poverty and boosting
 shared prosperity has been brought to the forefront and
 become internationally recognized. Indicators of commercial
 court performance, and business community perceptions of and
 trust in the courts, are a part of the World Bank Group’s
 (WBG) country-level investment climate assessments and its
 influential Investment Climate Surveys and Doing Business
 reports. Court performance has also become an element of
 European Union (EU) and Organization for Economic
 Co-operation and Development (OECD) accession. Helping
 countries to improve commercial court operations and ensure
 improved accessibility and effective delivery of services
 are important components of the development assistance
 provided by the WBG. The Commercial Court and Enforcement
 Assessment Tool has been designed to assist assessment teams
 and client agencies in this effort.
-
Developing Specialized Court Services : International Experiences and Lessons LearnedGramckow, Heike; Walsh, Barry (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-01)Court specialization is commonly considered to be an important reform initiative to advance the development of a successful judicial system. Court specialization is thought useful even to address broader development constraints, such as the need for more effective access to contract enforcement, improvements in the investment climate, or more adequate protection of the environment. These studies have also pointed to some drawbacks, however. For example, special attention to, and the allocation of additional resources for, handling business cases can lead to the perception that a court provides preferential services to the business community but not the average person. Judges may also develop too close a relationship with a particular group of lawyers and interest groups that are involved in special case types, especially if those groups are relatively small and if judges serve in this special capacity exclusively and for an extended period. This report outlines the international experiences and good practices related to establishing specialized courts and creating the associated judicial expertise. It specifically highlights the information that is needed to determine if specialization is required in particular areas, as well as the specialization model that may be most appropriate, the requirements of the different models, and the approaches to training and selecting judges for special assignments. The paper also outlines the next steps a jurisdiction might take to examine the potential need and demand for further specialized judicial services and to consider what would be needed to meet those which are justified.