Research Ethics Committees in Europe: Implementing the Directive, Respecting Diversity
Keywords
Clinical TrialsDecision Making
Ethics
Ethics Committees
Research
Research Ethics
Research Ethics Committees
Human Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Research+ethics+committees+in+Europe:+implementing+the+directive,+respecting+diversity&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=32&issue=8&date=2006-08&au=Hedgecoe,+A.;+Carvalho,+F.;+Lobmayer,+P.;+Raka,+F.https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.013888
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/971171
Abstract
With the recent Clinical Trials Directive, a degree of harmonisation into research ethics committees (RECs) across Europe, including the time taken to assess a trial proposal and the kinds of issues a committee should take into account, has been introduced by the European Union (EU). How four different member states-Hungary, Portugal, Sweden and the UK-have chosen to implement the directive is shown. Although this has resulted in four very different ways of structuring RECs, similar themes are present in all four cases, such as centralisation of control over RECs within member states, harmonisation of REC procedures across the EU and increased role of political decision making with regard to such committees.Date
2016-01-08Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/971171doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013888
Journal of Medical Ethics 2006 August; 32(8): 483-486
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Research+ethics+committees+in+Europe:+implementing+the+directive,+respecting+diversity&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=32&issue=8&date=2006-08&au=Hedgecoe,+A.;+Carvalho,+F.;+Lobmayer,+P.;+Raka,+F.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.013888
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/971171
DOI
10.1136/jme.2005.013888ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/jme.2005.013888
Scopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.