An interview with Jacques Rancière : on medium-specificity and discipline crossovers in modern art
Keywords
130101 Continuing and Community Education190103 Art Theory
190599 Visual Arts and Crafts not elsewhere classified
220207 History and Philosophy of the Humanities
220301 Aesthetics
modernism
aesthetics
society and culture
contemporary art
critical theory
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/54822/Abstract
Jacques Rancière's work on aesthetics has received a great deal of attention in recent years. Given his work has enormous range – covering art and literature, political theory, historiography, pedagogy and worker's history – Andrew McNamara and Toni Ross (UNSW) explore his wider critical ambitions in this interview, while showing how it leads to alternative insights into aesthetics. Rancière sets aside the core suppositions linking the medium to aesthetic judgment, which has informed many definitions of modernism. Rancière is emphatic in freeing aesthetic judgment from issues of medium-specificity. He argues that the idea of autonomy associated with medium-specificity – or 'truth to the medium' – was 'a very late one' in modernism, and that post-medium trends were already evident in early modernism. While not stressing a simple continuity between early modernism and contemporary art, Ranciere nonetheless emphasizes the on-going ethical and political ramifications of maintaining an a-disciplinary stance.Date
2007Type
Journal ArticleIdentifier
oai:eprints.qut.edu.au:54822http://eprints.qut.edu.au/54822/