Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRumyantseva, Nataliya L.
dc.contributor.authorCaboni, Timothy C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T19:44:36Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T19:44:36Z
dc.date.created2016-02-04 20:39
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifieroai:gala.gre.ac.uk:13277
dc.identifierRumyantseva, Nataliya L. and Caboni, Timothy C. (2012) Are academics in Kazakhstan capable of self-regulation? A study of faculty’s normative structure in the midst of higher education decentralization reforms. Tertiary Education and Management, 18 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1358-3883 (Print), 1573-1936 (Online) (doi:10.1080/13583883.2011.597057 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.597057>)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/455980
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the state and structure of professional norms in the context of undergraduate teaching in a university in Kazakhstan. The purpose is to understand the belief system held by academics with regards to their professional duties in the context of teaching. Evidence of such normative structure would suggest that the Kazakhstani academic profession holds potential for effective and ethical self-regulation; its absence would raise a red flag for university administrators and policy-makers. In order to place our findings in the meaningful context, we compare the normative structure in Kazakhstan to that of the US academic profession previously studied by Braxton and Bayer. We find that academics in Kazakhstan adhere to a normative structure which is quite similar to, although somewhat more relaxed than, that of US professors. We discuss the implications of these findings and empirical evidence for academic corruption in the context of decentralization reforms, authority devolution and formation of accountability mechanisms.
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.597057
dc.relation.ispartof10.1080/13583883.2011.597057
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://gala.gre.ac.uk/13277/
dc.subjectL Education (General)
dc.subjectLB2300 Higher Education
dc.subjectLC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education
dc.titleAre academics in Kazakhstan capable of self-regulation? A study of faculty’s normative structure in the midst of higher education decentralization reforms
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncodeEC
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:6465031
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/6465031
ge.lastmodificationdate2016-03-21 12:53
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid148650
ge.oai.repositoryid3405
ge.oai.setnameStatus = Published
ge.oai.setnameSubject = L Education: LC Special aspects of education: LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education
ge.oai.setnameSubject = L Education: LB Theory and practice of education: LB2300 Higher Education
ge.oai.setnameSubject = L Education: L Education (General)
ge.oai.setnameMaterial Type = Article
ge.oai.setspec7374617475733D707562
ge.oai.setspec7375626A656374733D4C:4C43:4C4335323031
ge.oai.setspec7375626A656374733D4C:4C42:4C4232333030
ge.oai.setspec7375626A656374733D4C:4C31
ge.oai.setspec74797065733D61727469636C65
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.597057
ge.linkhttp://gala.gre.ac.uk/13277/


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record