• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Ethics in Higher Education
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Ethics in Higher Education
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Umpositionierung unseres Eröffnungsbeitrags: Eine Stellungnahme zu den Beiträgen der Coteaching-Forscher

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Gallo-Fox, Jennifer; University of Delaware
Juck, Matthew; University of Delaware
Scantlebury, Kathryn; University of Delaware
Wassell, Beth; Rowan University
Keywords
Forschungsethik; Coteaching; multiple Perspektiven; Programm-Implementierung
research ethics; coteaching; multiple perspectives; program implementation
éticas de investigación; coteaching; perspectivas múltiples; implementación de programas

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/456276
Online Access
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/188
Abstract
Dieser Aufsatz antwortet auf die Stellungnahme unserer Kolleginnen und Kollegen zu unserem Artikel (GALLO-FOX, WASSELL, SCANTLEBURY & JUCK, 2006), der ethische Dilemmata thematisierte, mit denen wir bei der Implementierung des "Coteaching" in einer weiterführenden Schule konfrontiert wurden. Zum einen wurden diese Probleme in den Stellungnahmen thematisiert, darüber hinaus beschäftigten sich unsere Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit weiteren Aspekten, die sich auf ihre eigenen Erfahrungen mit der Implementierung und dem Erforschen von Coteaching beziehen. In diesem Artikel bringen wir diese Perspektiven zusammen und diskutieren Schlussfolgerungen für das Umsetzen von Coteaching. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604239
This paper is a response to our colleague's perspectives on our paper (GALLOFOX, WASSELL, SCANTLEBURY, & JUCK, 2006), that addressed ethical dilemmas we encountered when implementing coteaching in a secondary science education program. Although the respondents addressed this issue, they also raised other important points pertaining to their own experiences with implementing and researching coteaching. In this paper, we synthesize these perspectives and further discuss the implications of implementing coteaching. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604239
Este artículo es una respuesta a las perspectivas de nuestros colegas acerca nuestra contribución (GALLO-FOX, WASSELL, SCANTLEBURY, & JUCK 2006) que abordó los dilemas éticos que encontramos cuando implementamos coenseñanza en un programa de ciencias en secundaria. Aunque ellos aboraron este tema, también llamaron la atención a otros puntos importantes de su propia experiencia con la implementación y la investigación de la coenseñanza. En este artículo sintetizamos estas perspectivas y discutimos además las implicaciones de implementar la coenseñanza. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604239
Date
2006-09-30
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Identifier
oai:www.qualitative-research.net:article/188
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/188
Copyright/License
Copyright (c) 2006 Jennifer Gallo-Fox, Matthew Juck, Kathryn Scantlebury, Beth Wassell
Collections
Ethics in Higher Education

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.