Are Reviewers Suggested by Authors as Good as Those Chosen by Editors? Results of a Rater-Blinded, Retrospective Study
Online Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Are+reviewers+suggested+by+authors+as+good+as+those+chosen+by+editors?+Results+of+a+rater-blinded,+retrospective+study&title=BMC+Medicine+&volume=&issue=&date=2006-05&au=Wager,+E.;+Parkin,+E.C.;+Tamber,+P.S.http://hdl.handle.net/10822/972472
Date
2016-01-08Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/972472BMC Medicine 2006 May 30; 4: 13
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Are+reviewers+suggested+by+authors+as+good+as+those+chosen+by+editors?+Results+of+a+rater-blinded,+retrospective+study&title=BMC+Medicine+&volume=&issue=&date=2006-05&au=Wager,+E.;+Parkin,+E.C.;+Tamber,+P.S.
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/972472