Author(s)
Ciocchetti, Corey AKeywords
Teachingconnect with students
student evaluations
classroom performance
effective professors
effective teaching
connect in the classroom
teaching strategies
college professors
teaching improvement
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Law
Legal Education
Other Business
Other Law
Other Teacher Education and Professional Development
Secondary Education and Teaching
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://works.bepress.com/corey_ciocchetti/23http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=corey_ciocchetti
Abstract
This essay encapsulates my perspective (newly-tenured and seven years into my career) on how average professors can become highly effective professors. The secret rests in the ability to genuinely connect with students. Connecting really matters - even if it takes some personality adaptation and thrusts academics out of their comfort zones. Many professors fail to connect with students in a meaningful way. My evidence for this assertion is simple and straightforward. In addition to teaching, I am blessed to travel the country and speak on college campuses.3 After extensive discussions on these trips, students consistently claim their professors are boring, non-relatable, and unable to connect. On the other hand, professors I speak with sincerely believe they connect in the classroom. I remain convinced that: (1) these students are telling the truth, and (2) any failure to connect is generally unintentional. At the end of the day, academics simply fail to realize that no genuine connection is made. Similar issues plague the business arena when managers fail to engage with subordinates effectively and struggle. The following stereotypes come from an online college guide and typify professors who fail to connect. Can you find yourself and your colleagues on this list? • DR. BURNOUT - This professor has been teaching for way too long and secretly wishes he could run off to a tropical beach and sell snow cones for a living. He lacks enthusiasm and could care less if you learn anything. Dr. Burnout probably has tenure, so complaining won’t help. • DR. EGO TRIP - Don’t you dare call Dr. Ego Trip by her first name or otherwise indicate that she is not a goddess. In all likelihood, something awful happened in the childhood of this angry professor to cause her overblown sense of self, but this is not your concern. • DR. PRIMA DONNA - He would rather be doing research than teaching your class. If he’s at a liberal arts college, he is infuriated that he can’t get a job at a research institution, where he wouldn’t have to deal with peons like you all day. • DR. DRONE - Brilliant words might be coming out of her mouth, but she may as well be reciting the phone book. And Dr. Drone likes to talk, so she goes on and on and on and on. If you have to take a class with Dr. Drone, make sure it’s not an early morning class. • DR. DOGMA - Dr. Dogma wants to indoctrinate you with ideas, especially political ones. Now, all professors are entitled to express their opinions, so just because a professor is open about politics doesn’t mean he is Dr. Dogma. However, if your professor refuses to politely discuss ideas with the class, or gives students lower grades if they disagree with him, you are dealing with Dr. Dogma. There are kernels of truth found in the personalities above. In fact, each of us can perhaps identify all five types among our colleagues. The idea that faculty members do not see themselves as Dr. Drones when they clearly drone on for entire class sessions or Dr. Prima Donnas when they act like they cannot be bothered causes tension with students. Like it or not, students across the country scream out on their evaluations and online that they expect their college professors to do better.7 The second part of this essay ponders how to remedy this problem by genuinely connecting with students and, thereby, thriving in the classroom.Date
2011-08-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:works.bepress.com:corey_ciocchetti-1023http://works.bepress.com/corey_ciocchetti/23
http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=corey_ciocchetti
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Inside Indonesia's Mathematics Classrooms : A TIMSS Video Study of Teaching Practices and Student AchievementWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The following report is the first of a
 two-stage video study to examine teaching practices and
 activities in Indonesian classrooms. The first stage is
 linked to results of the 2007 Trends in International
 Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) where 100 of the 150
 classes that participated in the TIMSS examination also
 participated in this additional video study component. The
 second stage will also involve 100 classes that will
 participate in the 2011 exam. The second phase will follow
 the same methodology, allowing for comparison across years,
 but will also involve more in-depth analysis of the links
 between teaching practices and student outcomes and how
 teaching practices are influenced by teachers' belief
 systems and subject content knowledge. Indonesia has been a
 committed participant in the TIMSS, Program for
 International Student Assessment (PISA) and the Progress in
 International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) international
 standardized student examinations for many years and is one
 of the few non-OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation
 and Development) countries to participate so fully.
 Indonesian student performance in these examinations has
 been relatively low, even when taking socio-economic levels
 into account. For example, for mathematics Indonesia ranked
 36th out of 48 participating countries in TIMSS 2007, and
 its score of 397 was more than one standard deviation below
 the international average (Mullis et al, 2008). The results
 have been useful in providing an indication of
 Indonesia's relative standing in student achievement
 and its progress over time, but the real challenge is to
 take the next step and translate the results into an
 understanding of the factors leading to the test scores and
 what might be done to enhance student achievement in Indonesia.
-
System Approach for Better Education Results (SABER) : What Matters Most in Teacher Policies? A Framework for Building a More Effective Teaching ProfessionWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-07)The document is organized as follows.
 Section one provides an overview of the general approach,
 main components and objectives of the framework, as well as
 an explanation of the evidence base that supported its
 development. Section two focuses on the first component of
 the framework, and describes the categories that are
 relevant to produce a comprehensive descriptive account of
 the teacher policies that are in place in a given education
 system. Section three, in turn, focuses on policy guidance.
 It reviews those policies that, based on the available
 evidence to date, are known to matter most to improve
 student outcomes. It describes in detail the evidence
 supporting each of these policies, as well as the ways in
 which high performing education systems combine them to
 ensure outstanding student outcomes. The document concludes
 presenting an account of how the framework is expected to
 evolve as new evidence on teacher policies becomes available.
-
What Matters Most for Teacher Policies : A Framework PaperWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-09-15)Over the past decade, both developed and
 developing countries have become growingly concerned with
 how to raise the effectiveness of teachers. The growing
 focus on the need to strengthen the teaching profession to
 ensure better education results has encountered the problem
 that evidence on the policies that raise teaching quality is
 scattered, incomplete and, in some cases, presents
 contradictory findings. This paper provides a framework for
 analyzing teacher policies in education systems around the
 world in order to support informed education policy
 decisions. It provides a lens through which governments,
 World Bank staff, and other interested parties can focus the
 attention on what the relevant dimensions regarding teacher
 policies are, what teacher policies seem to matter most to
 improve student learning, and how to think about
 prioritization among competing policy options for teacher
 policy reform. The systems approach for better education
 results (SABER) - teachers initiative aims to collect,
 analyze, synthesize, and disseminate comprehensive
 information on teacher policies across countries around the
 world. The focus of the paper is the description of the
 conceptual framework to analyze and assess teacher policies,
 as well as a review of the evidence base that supports it.
 The document is organized as follows: section one provides
 an overview of the general approach, main components, and
 objectives of the framework, as well as an explanation of
 the evidence base that supported its development. Section
 two focuses on the first component of the framework, and
 describes the categories that are relevant to produce a
 comprehensive descriptive account of the teacher policies
 that are in place in a given education system. Section three
 focuses on policy guidance. Section four concludes
 presenting an account of how the framework is expected to
 evolve as new evidence on teacher policies becomes available.