After Liberalism [electronic resource] : Mass Democracy in the Managerial State
Author(s)
Gottfried, Paul, 1941- authorContributor(s)
Internet ArchiveKeywords
Liberalism & centre democratic ideologiesPolitical science & theory
Political structures: democracy
Politics/International Relations
Political Science
Politics / Current Events
Political Ideologies - Democracy
Political Philosophy
Political Science / Democracy
Political Science and International Relations
Welfare state
Public administration
Social engineering
Liberalism
Democracy
Cultural pluralism
Populism
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://archive.org/details/afterliberalism00paulAbstract
In this trenchant challenge to social engineering, Paul Gottfried analyzes a patricide: the slaying of nineteenth-century liberalism by the managerial state. Many people, of course, realize that liberalism no longer connotes distributed powers and bourgeois moral standards, the need to protect civil society from an encroaching state, or the virtues of vigorous self-government. Many also know that today's "liberals" have far different goals from those of their predecessors, aiming as they do largely to combat prejudice, to provide social services and welfare benefits, and to defend expressive and "lifestyle" freedoms. Paul Gottfried does more than analyze these historical facts, however. He builds on them to show why it matters that the managerial state has replaced traditional liberalism: the new regimes of social engineers, he maintains, are elitists, and their rule is consensual only in the sense that it is unopposed by any widespread organized oppositionPrint version record
Includes bibliographical references and index
Date
2001-01-01Identifier
oai:archive.org:afterliberalism00paulhttp://archive.org/details/afterliberalism00paul
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Development Strategies : Integrating Governance and GrowthLevy, Brian; Fukuyama, Francis (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-09-02)A frontier challenge for development strategy is to move beyond prescribing optimal economic policies, and instead -- taking a broad view of the interactions between economic, political and social constraints and dynamics -- to identify entry points capable of breaking a low-growth logjam, and initiating a virtuous spiral of cumulative change. The paper lays out four distinctive sequences via which the different dimensions might interact and evolve over time, and provides country-specific illustrations of each. Each sequence is defined by the principal focus of its initial step: 1) State capacity building provides a platform for accelerated growth via improved public sector performance and enhanced credibility for investors; strengthened political institutions and civil society come onto the agenda only over the longer term; 2) Transformational governance has as its entry point the reshaping of a country's political institutions. Accelerated growth could follow, insofar as institutional changes enhance accountability, and reduce the potential for arbitrary discretionary action -- and thereby shift expectations in a positive direction; 3) For 'just enough governance', the initial focus is on growth itself, with the aim of addressing specific capacity and institutional constraints as and when they become binding -- not seeking to anticipate and address in advance all possible institutional constraints; 4) Bottom-up development engages civil society as an entry point for seeking stronger state capacity, lower corruption, better public services, improvements in political institutions more broadly -- and a subsequent unlocking of constraints on growth. The sequences should not be viewed as a technocratic toolkit from which a putative reformer is free to choose. Recognizing that choice is constrained by history, the paper concludes by suggesting an approach for exploring what might the scope for identifying practical ways forward in specific country settings.
-
Organizing for Prosperity : Collective Action, Political Parties and the Political Economy of DevelopmentKeefer, Philip (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-08)The ability of citizens to act
 collectively plays a central role in major debates in the
 political economy of development, including the causes and
 consequences of democratization and clientelism. This essay
 uses two lines of research to underscore the importance of
 explicitly introducing the organization of collective action
 into these debates. Exhaustive research on the management of
 open access resources demonstrates that citizens'
 ability to act collectively depends on non-trivial
 organizational arrangements that allow leaders to sanction
 free-riding and allow members to replace leaders if they
 shirk. Other research demonstrates wide variability in the
 organization of political parties. In countries where
 political parties do not have these two organizational
 characteristics, public policies are less friendly to
 economic development. This evidence suggests that in future
 research on democracy, state-building and development,
 citizen organization should be a central object of analysis.
-
eParticipation in the institutional domain: a review of research: analytical report on eParticipation research from an administration and political perspective in six European countriesFreschi, Anna Carola; Medaglia, Rony; Nørbjerg, Jacob (DEMO-Net ConsortiumGBR, 2009-12-29)This deliverable of DEMO-net Project provides an analysis of existing research about eParticipation in the institutional domain. It includes a review of the empirical research about eParticipation in six European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, and Sweden) and in the international research. This report also provides a comparative picture of national and international research, and outlines overall research findings and research gaps.