Using an Ethical Model to Manage Patient-Soldier Confidentiality When Medical Treatment for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder is Refused
Online Access
https://aquila.usm.edu/ojhe/vol7/iss2/8https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1101&context=ojhe
Abstract
This paper reviews the ethical tensions and the dual loyalty conflict between following military orders and professional codes of conduct. All competent patients have a right to refuse medical treatment. However, maintaining confidentiality is not an absolute right. In the military, a doctor may have a dual loyalty conflict between obeying military orders and following professional codes of practice. This can become exacerbated when a doctor in a military environment does not consider all the parties’ interests. This paper suggests that dual loyalty conflict in military healthcare practice in this environment is best managed via a discretionary ethic-role. This then allows independent clinical judgment while at the same time minimizing ethical dilemmas, harm, and conflict to a third party such as a military commander.Date
2011-11-08Type
textIdentifier
oai:aquila.usm.edu:ojhe-1101https://aquila.usm.edu/ojhe/vol7/iss2/8
https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1101&context=ojhe