Antropología e historia en los Andes. A propósito de la introducción a la antropología histórica de Pier P. Viazzo
Author(s)
Arana Bustamante, LuisDepartamento Académico de Antropología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima - Perú.
Keywords
Antropología, historia, etnohistoria andina, antropología histórica en los Andes.Andean anthropology, Andean history, Andean ethnohistory, anthropological history, theory in Andean studies.
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
This book review puts in relationship international development of anthropological history with correspondent studies in the Andean area, presenting a few chronological and theoretical points for a historic and theoretical remarks for a history of this field of Andean studies.A través de un comentario del libro de P.P. Viazzo Introducción a la antropología histórica se trata de establecer algunos elementos para un análisis del desarrollo de los estudios de antropología histórica en los Andes. En su forma moderna, estos se establecieron dentro de la época de encuentros cercanos entre las dos disciplinas, estimada en los años cincuenta por el autor comentado.
Date
2014-06-11Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleIdentifier
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/7010http://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/7010
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
El efecto espejo: sexo, género y cuidado en las trayectorias profesionales y las jerarquías morales y laborales de la antropología en ColombiaZambrano, Marta; Durán Urrea, Margarita María (2017)This article examines how gender, sex, and care work have shaped the professional practices and labor careers of several cohorts of anthropologists who obtained their undergraduate degree from Universidad Nacional de Colombia between 1985 and 2010. Our findings draw on a qualitative research project that combined ethnographic, biographical, and historical approaches. We conducted 35 interviews (34 in-depth interviews and one group interview) with eighteen women and nineteen men, who fulfilled the following criteria of a conceptual sample: three graduation periods (1985-1991; 1992-2005; and 2006-2010), place of birth, socioeconomic status, sex, generation, age, marital status, and field of professional practice. We analyze the ways in which the obligations assumed by our interviewees with their parents, relatives, and offspring, and with their own self-care, have led them to interrupt their training or delay their graduation. We also explore how these kinship duties have resulted in differing and gender-biased work options and employment histories for men and women. We argue that both gender representations and practices of professional and applied anthropology and of science and technology have conditioned the asymmetrical careers of these anthropologists, as well as those of their peers. This paper explores, in addition, how their work histories have also been marked by unsatisfactory and often precarious work and employment conditions. Finally, we purport that an intersectional analysis of gender, ethics of care, and care work contributes to the understanding of Colombian anthropology´s distinct practices and orientations. We support this argument by analyzing the peer culture that invigorates this discipline and fuels confrontation between the labor and moral hierarchies that govern its professional and applied fields.
-
El efecto espejo: sexo, género y cuidado en las trayectorias profesionales y las jerarquías morales y laborales de la antropología en ColombiaZambrano, Marta; Durán Urrea, Margarita María (DIALNET OAI Articles, 2017)This article examines how gender, sex, and care work have shaped the professional practices and labor careers of several cohorts of anthropologists who obtained their undergraduate degree from Universidad Nacional de Colombia between 1985 and 2010. Our findings draw on a qualitative research project that combined ethnographic, biographical, and historical approaches. We conducted 35 interviews (34 in-depth interviews and one group interview) with eighteen women and nineteen men, who fulfilled the following criteria of a conceptual sample: three graduation periods (1985-1991; 1992-2005; and 2006-2010), place of birth, socioeconomic status, sex, generation, age, marital status, and field of professional practice. We analyze the ways in which the obligations assumed by our interviewees with their parents, relatives, and offspring, and with their own self-care, have led them to interrupt their training or delay their graduation. We also explore how these kinship duties have resulted in differing and gender-biased work options and employment histories for men and women. We argue that both gender representations and practices of professional and applied anthropology and of science and technology have conditioned the asymmetrical careers of these anthropologists, as well as those of their peers. This paper explores, in addition, how their work histories have also been marked by unsatisfactory and often precarious work and employment conditions. Finally, we purport that an intersectional analysis of gender, ethics of care, and care work contributes to the understanding of Colombian anthropology´s distinct practices and orientations. We support this argument by analyzing the peer culture that invigorates this discipline and fuels confrontation between the labor and moral hierarchies that govern its professional and applied fields.
-
Cidadania de quem? : possibilidades e limites da antropologiaLeal, Ondina Maria Fachel; Anjos, José Carlos Gomes dos (2018-09-14)Este trabalho – através do exemplo de um projeto de pesquisa e intervenção recém-concluído – pretende contribuir com uma discussão a respeito de cidadania naquilo que envolveria mais diretamente o nosso ofi cio de antropólogos. Trata-se de refl etirmos sobre as possibilidades e os limites da antropologia aplicada. Adiantamos que muitos são os limites, mas damo-nos conta também que a percepção desses limites está mais diretamente vinculada com o imenso potencial crítico que a própria disciplina antropológica nos instrumentaliza do que com a avaliação, estrito senso, da efi cácia da intervenção. É esta dimensão crítica associada ao fazer antropológico que pode trazer alguma real contribuição política.