Theorie der Politik im 20. Jahrhundert : von der Moderne zur Postmoderne
Author(s)
Beyme, Klaus von (1934-)Keywords
Politische Theorie -- Politikwissenschaftliche Theorien -- Theoriebildung -- Jahrhundert 20. -- Politische Ökonomie -- Politische PhilosophieStaatstheorie -- Bürgerliche Ideologie -- Marxismus -- Nonkonformismus -- Geschichtstheorie -- Politische Psychologie -- Rationalismus -- Systemtheorie -- Luhmann, Niklas -- Feminismus
Politologie
Geschichte der politischen Philosophie und der Ideologien
19. und 20. Jahrhundert
Allgemeines
Politologie
Politische Theorie, Grundbegriffe des Politischen
Politische Theorie, Allgemeines und Gesamtdarstellungen
Soziologie
Spezielle Soziologien
Politische Soziologie
Allgemeine Theorie und Gesamtdarstellungen
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://ixtheo.de/Record/025694685Date
1991Type
BookIdentifier
IXTHEO-https://ixtheo.de/Record/025694685ISBN
PRINT103518285696Copyright/License
All rights reservedCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Demokratie und Gerechtigkeit in VerteilungskonfliktenKreide, Regina (1968-) (Nomos, 2012)
-
Why are cultures warlike or peaceful? Test of regality theory on 186 non-industrial societiesFog, Agner (MISC, 2014-02-17)Regality theory is a theory saying that people show a preference for strong leadership in times of war or collective danger, but a preference for an egalitarian political system in times of peace andRegality theory is a theory saying that people show a preference for strong leadership in times of war or collective danger, but a preference for an egalitarian political system in times of peace and safety. These psychological preferences in individuals are reflected in the political structure and culture of the society. A society in danger will develop strong nationalism, discipline, strict religiosity, strict sexual morals and perfectionist art. A society in peace will develop in the direction of egalitarianism and tolerance.
 The article is both theoretical and experimental. Regality theory is explained and the theoretical basis of the theory is extended with contributions from evolutionary game theory, biological life history theory and ecological theory.
 The predictions of social-level effects of collective danger are tested by various statistical methods exploring the relationship between intergroup conflict and a number of indicators of social structure and culture in 186 non-industrial societies of the past based on data from Murdock and White's standard cross-cultural sample as well as a subsample based on ethnographic records. It is confirmed that a high level of intergroup conflict is connected with a hierarchical political system, a strict and punitive justice system, a strict religiosity, a high feeling of group identity, strict sexual morals, a higher workload on children, and embellished and perfectionist artistic expressions. Four other predicted effects do not show statistical significance. Intragroup conflict influences sexual morals but not the other cultural variables. It is also found that the level of conflict can be predicted from environmental and technological factors.
 Regality theory is compared with authoritarianism theory and various cultural theories. While some of these theories appear to describe related or identical phenomena, it is found that regality theory is the theory that best predicts the statistical results. Regality theory has important applications in both the natural and the social sciences, including the study of many psychological, political and cultural phenomena.
-
Attitudes, ideological associations and the left-right divide in Latin AmericaWiesehomeier, Nina; Doyle, David (DEU, 2012-06-19)Do Latin American citizens share a common conception of the ideological left–right distinction? And if so, is this conception linked to individuals’ ideological self-placement? Selecting questions from the 2006 Latinobarómetro survey based on a core definition of the left–right divide rooted in political theory and philosophy, this paper addresses these questions. We apply joint correspondence analysis to explore whether citizens who relate to the same ideological identification also share similar and coherent convictions and beliefs that reflect the ideological content of the left–right distinction. Our analysis indicates that theoretical conceptions about the roots of, and responsibility for, inequality in society, together with the translation of these beliefs into attitudes regarding the state versus market divide, distinguish those who self-identify with the left and those who self-identify with the right.