Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGerald West
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T13:53:06Z
dc.date.available2019-09-23T13:53:06Z
dc.date.created2017-09-29 00:20
dc.date.issued2013-09-01
dc.identifieroai:doaj.org/article:81093c9aa3584662a61be98384bfd4ad
dc.identifier1609-9982
dc.identifier2074-7705
dc.identifier10.4102/ve.v34i2.761
dc.identifierhttps://doaj.org/article/81093c9aa3584662a61be98384bfd4ad
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/51949
dc.description.abstract<span>Exegesis in the traditional sense is concerned with generating as much (scientific) detail about a biblical text as possible. Whilst the two primary modes of biblical exegesis � socio-historical and literary-semiotic � do this differently, they share a common concern for the detail of the text as an ancient artefact. Critical distance is a key concept here, with the exegetes bracketing (for a moment) their own contexts and concerns. However, such bracketing is impossible to sustain, and so the exegetes� interests (shaped by their contexts and concerns) �leak� into the act of exegesis. Most exegetes today recognise this leakage, and whilst some still view such leakage as contaminating the exegesis, others, including the tradition of African biblical scholarship, actively identify the contextual concerns they bring to the task of exegesis, both respecting the detail of the text and desiring to be accountable to their contexts in which the Bible is a significant text. This article explored some of the dimensions of forms of exegesis that actively seek appropriation, using 2 Samuel 13:1�22 as an example. In this case, the article analysed the contextual shift from a focus on women as the victims of sexual violence to an emerging emphasis on masculinities. Reading the same text from these different contextual concerns �activates� particular details of the text, and so both draw on different elements of the text and thus guides the gaze of exegesis.</span>
dc.languageAF
dc.languageDE
dc.languageEN
dc.languageNL
dc.publisherAOSIS
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/761
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/1609-9982
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/2074-7705
dc.sourceVerbum et Ecclesia , Vol 34, Iss 2 (2013)
dc.subjectAfrican hermeneutics
dc.subjectmasculinity
dc.subjectTamar
dc.subjectReligion (General)
dc.subjectBL1-50
dc.titleExegesis seeking appropriation; appropriation seeking exegesis: Re-reading 2 Samuel 13:1−22 in search of redemptive masculinities
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncode1609-9982
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:11660628
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gtl/11660628
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-09-29 00:20
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid147101
ge.oai.repositoryid52
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Religion (General)
ge.oai.setspecTENDOlJlbGlnaW9uIChHZW5lcmFsKQ~~
ge.oai.streamid5
ge.setnameGlobeTheoLib
ge.setspecglobetheolib
ge.linkhttps://doaj.org/article/81093c9aa3584662a61be98384bfd4ad


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record