All Your Eggs in One Basket: Why Contract Law Proves Unreliable in Frozen Embryo Adoption Cases
Author(s)
Caster, Austin RKeywords
embryoadoption
ART
ethics
contracts
family law
infertile
health
medical
parent
child
Contracts
Courts
Domestic Relations
Health Law and Policy
Judges
Jurisdiction
Law and Society
Law and Technology
Public Law and Legal Theory
Remedies
Science and Technology
Sexuality and the Law
Social Welfare
State and Local Government Law
Women
Law
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://works.bepress.com/austin_caster/3http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=austin_caster
Abstract
This article will show why infertile couples cannot unequivocally rely on good faith, consensual contracts in cases of assisted reproductive technology because the law is so unsettled. Each section will show why, because of alleged public policy implications, contract doctrines or clauses such as (1) the termination of parental rights, (2) the doctrine of waste, and (3) liquidated damages still remain almost completely unreliable in a matter regarding assisted reproductive technology. Though this uncertainty affects infertile couples trying to complete their families through various methods including adoption, surrogacy, in vitro fertilization, and artificial insemination, this article will focus on cases involving the donation, sometimes referred to as adoption, of frozen embryos.Date
2011-05-17Type
textIdentifier
oai:works.bepress.com:austin_caster-1003http://works.bepress.com/austin_caster/3
http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=austin_caster