Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuppes-Cluysenaer, Liesbeth
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T13:59:06Z
dc.date.available2019-09-23T13:59:06Z
dc.date.created2016-02-23 02:59
dc.date.issued2012-01-31
dc.identifieroai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/23080
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2011v10n2p223
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/55027
dc.description.abstracthttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2011v10n2p223Agamben characterizes in Homo Sacer the modern state in terms of biopolitics, referring to the theories of Arendt and Foucault. Agamben takes up in this context on a very influential interpretation of Aristotle by Arendt.  Arendt maintains in this reference to Aristotle a false idea of continuity and ignores the fact that – as Foucault shows - at the end of the eighteenth century an inherent connection was established between a completely new type of rationality, governing and the state. There is therefore an ontological difference between the ancient and modern era and this has – as will be shown in this article – far reaching consequences for the key-concepts of Homo Sacer such as bare life, sovereignty and law. The recent development of globalization gives new relevance to this ontological difference, especially by undermining  absolute state-sovereignty.
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2011v10n2p223/20916
dc.sourceethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy; v. 10, n. 2 (2011); 223-253
dc.subjectFilosofia; Ética
dc.subjectbiopolitics; bare life; sovereignty; law
dc.titleThe Fallacy of Continuity, on the references to Aristotle in Arendt and Agamben
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
ge.collectioncode1677-2954
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:6786402
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/6786402
ge.lastmodificationdate2016-03-21 15:27
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid53
ge.oai.repositoryid1802
ge.oai.setnameArtigos
ge.oai.setspecethic:ART
ge.oai.streamid1
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2011v10n2p223


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record