Nuclear reactor power for an electrically powered orbital transfer vehicle
Author(s)
Jaffe, L.Beatty, R.
Bhandari, P.
Chow, E.
Deininger, W.
Ewell, R.
Fujita, T.
Grossman, M.
Kia, T.
Nesmith, B.
Keywords
30 Direct Energy ConversionElements
Space Vehicle Components
Nesdps Office Of Nuclear Energy Space And Defense Power Systems
420200 -- Engineering-- Facilities, Equipment, & Techniques
Thrusters
300300 -- Thermoelectric Generators
Jets
Propellants
Nonmetals
42 Engineering
Propulsion Systems
Power Reactors
Communications
Space Vehicles
Xenon
Ion Thrusters
Mission Analysis
Reactors
Space Transport
Rare Gases
Vehicles Nesdps Office Of Nuclear Energy Space And Defense Power Systems 210600* -- Power Reactors, Auxiliary, Mobile Package, & Transportable
Metals
Design
Alkali Metals
Transport
21 Specific Nuclear Reactors And Associated Plants
Fluids
Gases
Electricity
Thermoelectricity
Space Power Reactors
Lithium
Mobile Reactors
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
To help determine the systems requirements for a 300-kWe space nuclear reactor power system, a mission and spacecraft have been examined which utilize electric propulsion and this nuclear reactor power for multiple transfers of cargo between low Earth orbit (LEO) and geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO). A propulsion system employing ion thrusters and xenon propellant was selected. Propellant and thrusters are replaced after each sortie to GEO. The mass of the Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV), empty and dry, is 11,000 kg; nominal propellant load is 5000 kg. The OTV operates between a circular orbit at 925 km altitude, 28.5 deg inclination, and GEO. Cargo is brought to the OTV by Shuttle and an Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle (OMV); the OTV then takes it to GEO. The OTV can also bring cargo back from GEO, for transfer by OMV to the Shuttle. OTV propellant is resupplied and the ion thrusters are replaced by the OMV before each trip to GEO. At the end of mission life, the OTV's electric propulsion is used to place it in a heliocentric orbit so that the reactor will not return to Earth. The nominal cargo capability to GEO is 6000 kg with a transit time of 120 days; 1350 kg can be transferred in 90 days, and 14,300 kg in 240 days. These capabilities can be considerably increased by using separate Shuttle launches to bring up propellant and cargo, or by changing to mercury propellant.Date
1987-01-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:info:ark/67531/metadc1106177oai:other: DE87011775
oai:rep-no: LA-UR-87-2003
oai:rep-no: CONF-870558-2
oai:grantno: W-7405-ENG-36
oai:osti: 6129885
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1106177/
oai:ark: ark:/67531/metadc1106177
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
TFE Verification ProgramDOE/CE (General Atomic Company, 1990-03-01)The objective of the semiannual progress report is to summarize the technical results obtained during the latest reporting period. The information presented herein will include evaluated test data, design evaluations, the results of analyses and the significance of results. The program objective is to demonstrate the technology readiness of a TFE suitable for use as the basic element in a thermionic reactor with electric power output in the 0.5 to 5.0 MW(e) range, and a full-power life of 7 years. The TF Verification Program builds directly on the technology and data base developed in the 1960s and 1970s in an AEC/NASA program, and in the SP-100 program conducted in 1983, 1984 and 1985. In the SP-100 program, the attractive but concern was expressed over the lack of fast reactor irradiation data. The TFE Verification Program addresses this concern. The general logic and strategy of the program to achieve its objectives is shown on Fig. 1-1. Five prior programs form the basis for the TFE Verification Program: (1) AEC/NASA program of the 1960s and early 1970; (2) SP-100 concept development program;(3) SP-100 thermionic technology program; (4) Thermionic irradiations program in TRIGA in FY-86; (5) and Thermionic Technology Program in 1986 and 1987. 18 refs., 64 figs., 43 tabs.
-
Heat resistant materials and their feasibility issues for a space nuclear transportation systemUnited States. Department of Energy; Olsen, C.S. (EG and G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (USA), 1991-01-01)A number of nuclear propulsion concepts based on solid-core nuclear propulsion are being evaluated for a nuclear propulsion transportation system to support the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI) involving the reestablishment of a manned lunar base and the subsequent exploration of Mars. These systems will require high-temperature materials to meet the operating conditions with appropriate reliability and safety built into these systems through the selection and testing of appropriate materials. The application of materials for nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) systems and the feasibility issues identified for their use will be discussed. Some mechanical property measurements have been obtained, and compatibility tests were conducted to help identify feasibility issues. 3 refs., 1 fig., 4 tabs.
-
Unique mission options available with a megawatt-class nuclear electric propulsion systemCoomes, E.P.; McCauley, L.A.; Christian, J.L.; Gomez, M.A.; Wong, W.A. (Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA), 1988-10-01)The advantages of using electric propulsion systems are well-known in the aerospace community with the most common being its high specific impulse, lower propellant requirements, and lower system mass. But these advantages may not be as important as the overall unique mission options electric propulsion makes possible, especially if the system is powered by a megawatt-class nuclear electric power source. Although the lack of suitable electric power systems has been a major drawback to electric propulsion, recent efforts have shown megawatt-class nuclear electric power systems are feasible and could be available by the turn of the century. Coupling this with the resurgence in interest in free-space electromagnetic transmission of energy and technology developments in this area provide a whole new aspect to the view of electric propulsion. The propulsion system now has a second mission function that may be of more value than the well understood benefits of electric propulsion; that is providing large quantities of prime power in support of a broad spectrum of mission tasks. 30 refs., 9 figs.