Segment 09: Turning MD Anderson Around Through the Aim For Excellence Program
Author(s)
Sollenberger, DonnaContributor(s)
Rosolowski, Tacey AnnKeywords
A: The Administrator; B: MD Anderson History; B: MD Anderson Culture; B: MD Anderson Mission and Values; B: Building/Transforming the Institution; C: Understanding the Institution; B: Multi-disciplinary Approaches; B: Growth and/or Change; B: Obstacles, Challenges; B: Institutional Processes; B: Controversy; C: Professional Practice; C: The Professional at Work; B: The Business of MD Anderson; B: Beyond the Institution;B: Building the Institution; B: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center;
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
Ms. Sollenberger explains the Aim for Excellence Program adopted in about 1995 in response to the accrediting body for managed-care participation. This was an early program for quality control in health care: Ms. Sollenberger describes the mission and some of the people involved in setting up the program at MD Anderson. [brief pause] Ms. Sollenberger lists the indicators the Aim For Excellence Team looked for in determining quality, using the guideline that “systems are at fault, not people.” The team worked for process improvement based on the growing idea in the industry that eliminating duplication and increasing clarity reduces chances for errors. Ms. Sollenberger observes Lean Design was incorporated into the quality movement because of this perspective. Ms. Sollenberger describes how the Care Centers were geared to effectiveness in providing multi-disciplinary care and that this was something patients didn’t find elsewhere. She describes the changes and retraining that faculty and staff had to accept in order to move to this system (this included requirements that some staff members reapply for their jobs). She also explains how the team communicated the changes to employees, noting that a “matrixed environment” makes it difficult for some individuals to function. After a couple of years, the institution’s margins improved, with the best profits coming from international business. Her team set up an international office to cultivate this business. Ms. Sollenberger lists the people who led MD Anderson’s turnaround after a financial crisis. She also talks about what would have happened if the institution had failed.Date
September 27, 2013Type
Interview Segment;Identifier
oai:cdm16333.contentdm.oclc.org:p16333coll1/1762Sollenberger,D_01_20130927_S09
http://cdm16333.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16333coll1/id/1762
Copyright/License
Donna Sollenberger, Oral History Interview, September 27, 2013, Historical Resources Center, Research Medical Library, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Judicial Systems in Transition Economies : Assessing the Past, Looking to the FutureGray, Cheryl W.; Bernstein, Daivd S.; Anderson, James H. (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005)The report examines how courts have performed, and reveals their impact on public opinion and the business environment. It provides insight into linkages among reforms as well as linkages between reforms and public demand for a fair judiciary. The authors show that while each country presents different challenges and opportunities, certain lessons apply in most settings. Their insights and data would be useful to policy makers, judicial personnel, and those involved in reforming judiciaries.
-
Korea and the Knowledge-based Economy : Making the TransitionDahlman, Carl; Anderson, Thomas; Anderson, Thomas; Dahlman, Carl (Washington, DC: World Bank and OECD, 2000-06)Knowledge is fast becoming a key factor in economic and social development worldwide. Rapid innovations in science, communications and computing technologies are opening up new opportunities for countries to harness knowledge and participate more fully in the global economy. Developing countries that successfully make the transition to the knowledge-based economy will have unprecedented possibilities to become more competitive in world markets and to participate in the global information society. New technologies can also extend the benefits of knowledge to all segments of society and help countries close the gap in living standards among their citizens. This book defines a knowledge-based economy as one where knowledge is created, acquired, transmitted and used effectively by enterprises, organizations, individuals and communities. It does not focus narrowly on high-technology industries or on information and communications technologies, but rather presents a framework for analyzing a range of policy options in education, information infrastructure and innovation systems that can help usher in the knowledge economy. It also makes the case for better co-ordination among the government, the private sector and civil society to enhance competitiveness and advance economic and social development.
-
Buildings Market Institutions in South Eastern Europe : Comparative Prospects for Investment and Private Sector DevelopmentSlavova, Stefka; Broadman, Harry G.; Vagliasindi, Maria; Ryterman, Randi; Vincelette, Gallina A.; Anderson, James; Claessens, Constantijn A. (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013-08-08)This report studies impediments to
 investment and private sector development in Albania, Bosnia
 and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the former Yugoslav
 Republic of Macedonia, Moldova, Romania, and Serbia and
 Montenegro. It aims to yield fundamentally new insights for
 improving the region's business environment, economic
 development, and prospects for growth. It focuses on four
 core topics: 1) Business competition and economic barriers
 to entry and exit; 2) Access to regulated utilities and
 services; 3) Corporate ownership, transparency of business
 accounts, and access to finance; and 4) Mechanisms for
 commercial dispute resolution. Each topic is empirically
 investigated across all eight South Eastern European
 countries through the systematic use of data from multiple
 sources: Official data from each country in the region;
 results from two annual rounds of quantitative, firm-level
 surveys covering 1,600 firms; and results from 40 originally
 developed enterprise-level business case studies. The result
 is an innovative analysis of cross-country comparisons and
 the development of key policy challenges from a regional
 perspective. The report ends by making concrete
 recommendations for reforms that would ease the constraints
 on domestic and foreign investment, an essential step in
 sustaining growth and reducing poverty in the region.