A theological alternative to Grube’s notion of ‘justified religious difference’

Abstract

Grube proposes a framework for respectful dealing with different religions: ‘justified
 religious difference. The author comments on the epistemic setting of Grube’s thesis. It
 testifies a cognitive approach to religious faith by handling religious faith and epistemic
 belief as analogous argument. His criticism of the pluralist approach is not very convincing.
 This framework is too abstract for an interreligious dialogue. The author proposes a concept
 of religious faith within a web of practices, liturgical rituals. A concrete interreligious
 dialogue can enrich the Christian faith in its practical styling.

http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjpt20

2018-04-30

hb2017

Dogmatics and Christian Ethics