• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • français 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Ouvrir une session
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Parcourir par

Tout DSpaceUnité de recherchePar date de publicationTitreSujetsAuteurCe laboratoirePar date de publicationTitreSujetsAuteurProfilesView

Mon compte

S'identifier

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Tempo e pena di morte. Un seminario triestino

  • Admin CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Derrida, Jacques
Keywords
time
death penalty

Métadonnées
Afficher la notice complète
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/59420
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5607
Abstract
During the seminar 'Time and Death penalty', which took place on November 14th 2000 in Triest's Department of Philosophy, Jacques Derrida presented a summary of his lectures of Paris and Irvine: 'Responsibility Problems. Forgiveness, Perjury and Death Penalty'. In Derrida's opinion the philosophical thought has never been - historically - against death penalty. Philosophy has either shown agreement towards its principle or it has remained silent. The aim of deconstruction is to confute the philosophical principles in favour of death penalty (in partucular the concept of sovereignity), therefore producing a philosophically relevant thought capable of facing such a complex and delicate ethical-political situation. For this purpose Derrida relates the issue of reason to the issue of a 'supernatural world', in which the philosophical responsibility of a different form of reasoning is located. The obvious and immediate comparison is with Kant's position, whose inner contradictions are closely analysed by Derrida. The second reference is the psychoanalytical tradition, which Derrida profusely uses in order to show the equivocal nature of concepts such as 'cruelty' and 'exception' that characterise the juridical and political discourse on death penalty; opaque concepts which constitute its hidden foundation.
Date
2011-11-18
Type
Articolo
Identifier
oai:www.openstarts.units.it:10077/5607
Jacques Derrida, "Tempo e pena di morte. Un seminario triestino", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, III (2001) 1
1825-5167
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5607
Collections
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contactez-nous
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.