• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Theology and ecumenism
  • Interreligious Dialogue
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Theology and ecumenism
  • Interreligious Dialogue
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

The chronology of the “Genealogy of Adam through Noah” (Gen 5) in the edited Slavonicrussian Pentateuch of the 15th century: on the origins of Calendric controversy with the “Judaizers”

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Alexander Grishchenko
Keywords
heresy of “Judaisers”
Jewish-Christian relations
15th century
Biblical studies
textual criticism
eschatology
chronology
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Literature (General)
PN1-6790
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/594815
Online Access
https://dx.doi.org/10.15382/sturIII201856.9-47
https://doaj.org/article/5e6fa92cc2b1404fa93b804d253da76b
Abstract
This article analyses the glosses and emendations in the “Genealogy of Adam through Noah” (Gen 5) from the Edited Slavonic-Russian Pentateuch, known from copies since the end of the 15th century, in the wide context of eschatological expectations ca. 1492, i.e., in 7000 according to the Creation Era of Constantinople, when both Eastern Slavic Orthodox and Eastern European Jewish bookmen were waiting the end of the eorld (the Second Coming for the Christians and the Geulah for the Jews correspondingly). However, the chronology of the Septuagint and the Masoretic Text (and the Vulgate) does not coincide: the latter is rather shorter and, therefore, the year 7000 seems to be far from that time. The “Genealogy” in the Edited Pentateuch also used the chronology of the Masoretic Text rather than the Vulgate, as the names of the antediluvian patriarchs in the forms excluding any Greek of Latin mediation were written on the margins of the manuscript. Thus, the Edited Slavonic- Russian Pentateuch could be hypothesised as the “Russian Judaisers’ Pentateuch”.
Date
2018-12-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:doaj.org/article:5e6fa92cc2b1404fa93b804d253da76b
1991-6485
2409-4897
http://dx.doi.org/10.15382/sturIII201856.9-47
https://doaj.org/article/5e6fa92cc2b1404fa93b804d253da76b
Collections
Interreligious Dialogue

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.