Muslim-Christian relations in the New Order Indonesia: the exclusivist and inclusivist Muslims' perspectives
KeywordsMuslim-Christian relations, Muslims in Indonesia, Islam in Indonesia, Christians in Indonesia, Christianity in Indonesia, exclusivists, inclusivists
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractIn contrast, the relationships between inclusivists Muslims and Christians are coloured largely by harmony. The inclusivists chose to work within the New Order system for changes beneficial to Indonesian Muslims by avoiding direct conflict with the government and occupying themselves with intellectual endeavours. Against such a backdrop, the renewal of Islamic thought, characterised mainly by inclusivism, was introduced and developed. Moreover, the inclusivists hold the view that plurality is a law of nature (sunnatullah). Within this view, all religions are seen to adhere to the same principle of One Truth; and will therefore gradually find their ‘common platform’ or kalimatun sawa. As a reflection of their perspective on religious pluralism, most inclusivists admit the existence and rights of other religious believers, especially the ahl al-kitab.
In separate chapters, the study then explores the backgrounds and concerns of the exclusivists and inclusivists in relations to Muslim Christian relations. It found that among both exclusivists and inclusivists the degree of ‘exclusiveness’ or ‘inclusiveness’ varied, as they were influenced by their different backgrounds. In addition, within each groups or among individuals, the concerns on issues related to Muslim-Christian relations differed. Four main exclusivist institutions are discussed in the study: the Dewan Dakwah Islamiyah Indonesia (DDII), the Komite Indonesia untuk Solidaritas Dunia Islam (KISDI), the Forum Pembela Islam (FPI), and the Laskar Jihad. Key issues discussed by the exclusivists include the Christian ‘other’, relations between religion and the state, Christianisation, and the Ambon conflicts. The relations between the exclusivists and the Christians have been coloured largely by disharmony. Exclusivists believe that Christianity underwent alteration and that the God of Muslims is different from the Christian God, who is described as having offspring. In addition, all exclusivist groups in the study stated the view that it was the Christianisation activities that tore apart the relationship between Muslims and Christians.
In dealing with this subject, the theological and legal precepts on the ‘religious’ other as developed in some classical texts are explored briefly. In order to provide the historical background of current Muslim-Christian relations, the study then investigates policies of the Dutch, Old Order, and New Order governments on Muslims and Christians. During the Dutch regime, Christians received better treatment as compared to Muslims. This was deeply resented by some Muslims, who identified the Dutch as Christians and Christians as colonists. By the time Indonesians were approaching independence, Muslim, Christian and other religious groups were preoccupied with deciding the philosophical basis of the state, and the Sukarno government paid scant attention to the hidden tense relations between Muslims and Christians. With the shift to the New Order period, Muslim-Christian relations changed dramatically because Soeharto intentionally and carefully controlled Indonesians based on the policy of SARA. The study found that some elements of SARA policy caused tensions between Muslims and Christians.
The study found that it was the exclusivists who were more adamant in criticising the inclusivists through articles in their media or sermons in their mosques. Three of their important critiques are the belief that the inclusivists have established a link with Jews and Christians, that inclusivism weakens Muslim faith by giving new interpretations to the Islamic foundation texts that deviate from the accepted views, and that inclusivists lack concern about Christianisation. In contrast, the inclusivists tend not to criticise or respond to critiques directed at them by the exclusivists, as they consider these to be emotional or personal.
The relationship between Muslims and Christian in Indonesia is and important subject. Apart from a few investigations on certain conflicts in different areas of Indonesia, little effort has been devoted to thoroughly examining the complexity of the relationship between the two religious groups. This study is an attempt to investigate the perspectives of the exclusivist and inclusivist Muslims on Muslim-Christian relations in Indonesia, especially during the New Order period (1965-1998).
Copyright/LicenseTerms and Conditions: Copyright in works deposited in the University of Melbourne Eprints Repository (UMER) is retained by the copyright owner. The work may not be altered without permission from the copyright owner. Readers may only, download, print, and save electronic copies of whole works for their own personal non-commercial use. Any use that exceeds these limits requires permission from the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from these works.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
HIV, AIDS and gender issues in Indonesia : implications for policy : an application of complexity theoryDu Plessis, G. E.; Damar, Alita P. (2015-06-03)The aim of the study was to offer solutions for the enhancement of Indonesia’s HIV
and AIDS policy and to suggest future possibilities. In the process, the gendered
nature of the epidemic was explored. In light of the relatively lower rates of
employment among Indonesian women, this study also sought to gain insights into
the possible reasons for many women appearing to be attached to domesticity.
In the first phase of the study, interviews with stakeholders in HIV and AIDS
prevention were conducted, followed by a Delphi exercise involving 23 HIV and
AIDS experts. In the second phase, 28 women from various ethnicities were
interviewed, including those in polygamous and contract marriages. The overall
results were interpreted through the lens of complexity theory.
Fewer than half of the proposed objectives were approved by the experts in the
Delphi round. These were interventions mainly aimed at the risk groups while most
objectives relating to education about HIV and AIDS and safer sex for the general
public failed to obtain consensus. Reasons for the lack of consensus were
differences in perceptions associated with human rights, moral reasoning, the
unfeasibility of certain statements and personal conviction about the control of the epidemic. Emphasis on men’s and women’s innate characteristics; men’s role as
breadwinner; women’s primary role as wife, mother and educator of their children;
and unplanned pregnancies emerged as major themes from the qualitative phase.
While the adat and Islam revival movements may have endorsed the ideals of the
New Order state ideology, Javanese rituals regarded as violating Islam teachings
were abandoned. Ignorance about safer sex and HIV and AIDS was also established. Interpretation of the results through the lens of complexity theory revealed that the
national HIV and AIDS policy needs to encompass interventions for the general
population, which would include comprehensive sex education in schools and
media campaigns focusing on women. It was found that women’s vulnerability to
HIV and their penchant for domesticity appear to be associated with their
perceived primary role as wife and mother, as promoted by the adat-based New Order state ideology.
Harrison Forman Diary, Bali, March 1956Forman, Harrison, 1904-1978 (1956-03)Harrison Forman, photographer and journalist, writes in this diary about his trip to the islands of Bali, Sumbawa, Komodo, and Flores in Indonesia. He begins his journey in Benoa on the island of Bali, describing the people and landscape. Forman writes briefly about his visit with the Belgian artist, Adrien-Jean Le Mayeur and his wife. He travels by boat to the island of Sumbawa and talks with Hilmi Oesman about vaccinating horses against anthrax. Forman writes briefly about Mount Tambora and Mount Rinjani volcanoes, and lists names of anthropologists who have studied Indonesian history and culture, such as Peter Goethals, Violet Mary Clifton, Francis Henry Hill Guillemard, and Augustus Henry Keane. Forman describes the landscape as he travels across the island to Dompu, then interviews Dr. Georg Poch who was one of the first doctors to come to Sumbawa three years earlier. He notes his observations about the people and their customs, such as chewing betel nut (a seed of the Areca palm), most people being barefoot, and the absence of veils typically worn by women in a predominantly Muslim community. In Bima on the eastern coast of Sumbawa, Forman meets with the Chief of Police who assigns a police officer to travel with Forman to the island of Komodo to see the infamous Komodo dragon, the largest living species of lizard. Forman suspects he's being swindled by the police officer and the boat captain who take him to the island. It takes several days on the boat, sailing with no wind, to get to Komodo Island, where Forman finally sees the elusive lizards. They sail to Labuan Bajo, a fishing town on the western coast of Flores Island, where Forman meets a Chinese shop owner who takes him by motorboat, then by truck to Ruteng. At the end of the diary, Forman writes several pages about the Komodo dragon and crocodiles, quoting from the book &quot;Reptiles of the Pacific World&quot; written by Arthur Loveridge in 1946.