Online Access
https://philpapers.org/rec/HOSNFAAbstract
This paper discusses the "numbers problem," the problem of explaining why you should save more people rather than fewer when forced to choose. Existing non-consequentialist approaches to the problem appeal to fairness to explain why. I argue that this is a mistake and that we can give a more satisfying answer by appealing to requirements of charity or beneficence.Date
manuscriptType
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleIdentifier
oai:philpapers.org/rec/HOSNFAhttps://philpapers.org/rec/HOSNFA