Историческите транформации при конструкцията на задължителната противоправна заповед в българската правна система
Author(s)
Младенов, МладенKeywords
Economic policy. Management. MarketingLabor economics
Organizational behavior
Ethics (Moral philosophy)
Administrative law
Constitutional and administrative law
Contractual law, law of obligation
Criminal law
Different aspects of law
Justice. Civil Procedure Code
Labour law
Law. Philosophy and theory
Penal/criminal law. Criminal procedure
Powers of the state, state authority. Legislature. Judicial authorities
Administration of public safety and related fields
General philosophy
Civil and political rights
Systems of governments and states
Differential and developmental psychology
Civil services
Government service
Government work forces
Public administration
Public safety. International safety
Political sociology
Social behavior. Social psychology
Social interaction. Social processes
Social sciences
Sociology of culture and civilization
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
Проблемът за задължителната противоправна заповед не би трябвало да съществува от формално-юридическо естество. В един стерилен и идеализиран юридически свят, заповедта трябва да е само и единствено правомерна, изпълнението й – също. За съжаление, реалният живот все още поражда, и очевидно – ще го прави и в бъдеще, фактически ситуации от рода на конструкцията на задължителната противоправна заповед.Date
2016Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:eprints.nbu.bg:3473http://eprints.nbu.bg/3473/1/Historical%20Transformation%20in%20Construction%20of%20Obligatory%20Illegal%20order%20in%20Bulgarian%20Legal%20System.pdf
Младенов, Младен (2016) Историческите транформации при конструкцията на задължителната противоправна заповед в българската правна система. Studia Iuridico-Historica, V (5). pp. 120-137. ISSN 1314-9296
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Social Protection in Low Income Countries and Fragile Situations : Challenges and Future DirectionsOvadiya, Mirey; Zampaglione, Giuseppe; Das, Maitreyi; Andrews, Colin; Elder, John (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-28)Demand for social protection is growing in low income countries and fragile situations. In recent years, the success of social protection (SP) interventions in middle income countries (MICs) like Brazil and Mexico, along with the series of food, fuel, and financial crises, has prompted policymakers in low income countries (LICs) and fragile situations (FSs) to examine the possibility of introducing such programs in their own countries. Flagship programs in countries as diverse as Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, and Rwanda have shown the adaptability of social protection interventions to the LIC context. Yet, despite growing levels of support for these initiatives, many challenges remain. In LICs and FSs, governments are confronted with a nexus of mutually reinforcing deficits that increase the need for SP programs and simultaneously reduce their ability to successfully respond. Governments face hard choices about the type, affordability, and sustainability of SP interventions. The paper reviews how these factors affect SP programs in these countries and identifies ways to address the deficits. It supports the establishment of resilient SP systems to address specific needs and vulnerabilities and to respond flexibly to both slow and sudden onset crises. To achieve this, both innovation and pragmatism are required in three strategic areas: (i) building the basic blocks of SP systems (e.g., targeting, payments, and monitoring and evaluation); (ii) ensuring financial sustainability; and (iii) promoting good governance and transparency. These issues suggest the possibility of a different trajectory in the development of social protection in LICs than in MICs. The implications for World Bank support include the need to focus on increasing knowledge and operational effectiveness of SP programs, fostering institutional links between multiple SP programs, and using community capacity and technological innovations to overcome bottlenecks in operations.
-
Managing Risk, Promoting GrowthWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-02-08)A growing body of evidence demonstrates
 that individuals and households experience a range of
 positive outcomes from social protection. Social protection
 increases productivity and growth. Countries can realize
 significant benefits by creating an integrated social
 protection system. Social protection is affordable in
 low-income countries despite tight budgets. While overall
 spending on social protection in Africa remains low by
 international standards, experience suggests that social
 protection programs can achieve national coverage at the
 cost of only 1 to 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
 While this is only a portion of the financing required to
 operate a social protection system, it draws attention to
 what countries can achieve in the short-term. Indeed, one
 way in which existing social protection spending can be made
 significantly more efficient would be by reallocating
 existing financing for inefficient subsidies and ad hoc
 emergency food aid to predictable safety nets. At the same
 time, pursuing reforms to social security systems will
 ensure their fiscal sustainability, while expanding
 coverage. Notably, the costs of not protecting poor families
 are very high, are borne disproportionately by women and
 children, and undermine the productivity of future
 generations. The Strategy will be implemented by leveraging
 partnerships, knowledge, and the World Bank's financing
 instruments. The World Bank will continue to invest in
 analytical work to fill knowledge gaps and promote an
 evidence-based dialogue for social protection systems in
 Africa and further innovation. It will work with governments
 to build country-owned national social protection systems
 with the aim of reducing fragmentation in the sector. The
 Bank also will pay particular attention to institutional
 development and capacity building by using its lending to
 increase the coverage of successful social protection
 interventions. Throughout this work, the Bank will work in
 coordination with governments, development partners, the
 private sector, academics, civil society, and beneficiaries.
-
8. PARTITE POLITIKE, Pjesa E Dyte, LEKSIONE MBI POLITIKEN8. PARTITE POLITIKE, Pjesa E Dyte, LEKSIONE MBI POLITIKEN