Author(s)
Bongrae SeokKeywords
Moral geographySpace of moral possibility
Naturalized ethics
Human flourishing
Moral emotion
Moral psychology
Anger
Self
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
This article reviews Owen Flanagan’s latest book “The Geography of Morals, Varieties of Moral Possibilities” (2017). By exploring the space of moral possibility (i.e., diverse options and viewpoints of morality from different philosophical and religious traditions throughout the world), Flanagan argues that ethics is not simply a study of a priori conditions of normative rules and ideal values but a process of developing a careful understanding of varying conditions of human ecology and building practical views on living good life. The goal of this geographical exploration of the moral possibility space is surveying different traditions of morality and finding tractable ways of human flourishing. This article, by following the chapters of his book, explains his views on moral diversity and his interdisciplinary and naturalistic approach to ethics. It also discusses interactive and dynamic ways to expand the moral possibility space. Date
2017-12-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:doaj.org/article:a0871a26f0bf43bdaab7dd35ff07a6c32474-1795
https://doaj.org/article/a0871a26f0bf43bdaab7dd35ff07a6c3
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Cuando la acción moral no provoca admiración sino resentimiento: el rechazo del rebelde moralAitziber Pascual; Susana Conejero; Itziar Etxebarria (Aposta, 2022-04-01)La observación de acciones moralmente ejemplares normalmente provoca emociones positivas (admiración, respeto…) respecto a quien las realiza. Cuando las acciones son especialmente costosas o inusuales puede provocar incluso elevación moral, una emoción que conlleva deseos de estrechar el contacto con quien así actúa, de emular su conducta y de ser mejor persona. Sin embargo, no siempre es así. En ocasiones la acción del rebelde moral, la persona que no acepta permanecer en silencio o adaptarse a lo que hacen los demás cuando ello contraviene sus principios y valores, provoca rechazo, resentimiento. En este texto se revisa la investigación actual sobre este fenómeno paradójico: los estudios empíricos que lo avalan, cómo puede explicarse, las estrategias defensivas que se ponen en marcha frente al rebelde moral y las características personales de los rebeldes morales. Finalmente, se reflexiona sobre las implicaciones del rechazo del rebelde moral tanto para este como para el grupo social.
-
Extension du domaine de l’éthiqueOgien, Ruwen (Département d'anthropologie de l'Université LavalÉrudit, 2009)Certaines recherches récentes sur l’universalité morale partent de l’idée que nos jugements moraux sont composés d’intuitions morales (réactions immédiates, non réfléchies) et de rationalisations morales (constructions intellectuelles destinées à donner des justifications socialement acceptables à nos actions). Elles aboutissent à la conclusion que l’universalité morale existe seulement au niveau intuitif. Dans cet article, L’objectif est de montrer que cette hypothèse n’est pas justifiée, en concentrant mon attention sur le problème des intuitions relatives à l’extension du domaine de l’éthique. Dans l’état présent du débat, il n’y a aucun argument décisif en faveur de l’universalité de ces intuitions morales, ni même en faveur de la distinction entre intuitions et rationalisations morales qui est à la base de ces analyses empiriques de l’universalité morale. En conclusion, l’universalité morale n’est pas empirique mais normative.
-
An Analytical and Critical View of Reid’s Ethical IntuitionismAli Akbar Abdolabadi (University of Tabriz, 2013-06-01)In this paper, I have tried to present, by a descriptive – analytic method, an analytical description of, the eighteenth century Scottish philosopher, Thomas Reid's ethical theory - which is known as "Common-Sense Intuitionism" – on the way of perceiving and acknowledging the moral values and norms, and through this analytical description, answering these two questions: "How far does the scope of Reid's ethical intuitionism contain?" and "What is Reid's explanation of the origin of moral error?" With reference to the above-mentioned analytical description, and by clarifying some of the pros and cons of Reid's ethical theory, I have tried to show, first, "Whether Reid's ethical theory is a justified, defensible and acceptable theory in justifying the validity of ethical knowledge?" And then, “Whether Reid's explanation of the origin of men's moral error is a sufficient explanation?"