Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFerry-Danini, Juliette
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-26T00:26:44Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T00:26:44Z
dc.date.created2018-06-14 23:09
dc.date.issuedforthcoming
dc.identifieroai:philpapers.org/rec/FERSPA-11
dc.identifierhttps://philpapers.org/rec/FERSPA-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/627535
dc.description.abstractIn some quarters within philosophy of medicine, more particularly in the phenomenological approaches, naturalism is looked upon with suspicion. This paper argues, first, that it is necessary to distinguish between two expressions of this attitude towards naturalism: phenomenological approaches to illness disagree with naturalism regarding various theoretical claims and they disapprove of naturalism on an ethical level. Second, this paper argues that both the disagreement with and the disapproval of naturalism are to a large extent confused. It then offers some proposals to set up an agenda for future collaboration.
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleShould phenomenological approaches to illness be wary of naturalism?
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
ge.collectioncodeGA
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:14684143
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/14684143
ge.lastmodificationdate2018-06-14 23:09
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid149453
ge.oai.repositoryid4212
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttps://philpapers.org/rec/FERSPA-11


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record