Law and Political Thought
dc.contributor.author | Baur, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-26T00:37:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-26T00:37:28Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-04-28 23:34 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier | oai:philpapers.org/rec/BAULAP | |
dc.identifier | https://philpapers.org/rec/BAULAP | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/634150 | |
dc.description.abstract | In the modern period, the most original and influential theories about law and politics were developed in connection with a set of far-reaching, interrelated questions about the definition of law, the purpose of law, the relationship between law and morality, and the existence of natural law and natural rights. In this entry I summarize the contributions of Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu; William Blackstone; Jeremy Bentham; and Immanuel Kant as exemplars of the history of modern thought on law and politics. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Philosophy | |
dc.title | Law and Political Thought | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
ge.collectioncode | GA | |
ge.dataimportlabel | OAI metadata object | |
ge.identifier.legacy | globethics:16170031 | |
ge.identifier.permalink | https://www.globethics.net/gel/16170031 | |
ge.lastmodificationdate | 2019-04-28 23:34 | |
ge.lastmodificationuser | admin@pointsoftware.ch (import) | |
ge.submissions | 0 | |
ge.oai.exportid | 149453 | |
ge.oai.repositoryid | 4212 | |
ge.oai.streamid | 2 | |
ge.setname | GlobeEthicsLib | |
ge.setspec | globeethicslib | |
ge.link | https://philpapers.org/rec/BAULAP |