Pure reason and contemporary philosophy of religion: the rational striving in and for truth
Author(s)
Anderson, Pamela SueKeywords
PhilosophyKant
reason
<em>Conatus</em>
limits
critique
Theology and Religion
Spinoza
boundaries
analytic
Philosophy,psychology and sociology of religion
reflective critical openness
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but the original publication is available at springerlink.com (which you may be able to access via the publisher copy link on this record page).This essay urges contemporary philosophers of religion to rethink the role that Kant's critical philosophy has played both in establishing the analytic nature of modern philosophy and in developing a critique of reason's drive for the unconditioned. In particular, the essay demonstrates the contribution that Kant and other modern rationalists such as Spinoza can still make today to our rational striving in and for truth. This demonstration focuses on a recent group of analytic philosophers of religion who have labelled their own work 'analytic theology' and have generated new debates, including new arguments about Kant bridging philosophy and theology. Cultivation of a reflective critical openness is encouraged here; this is a practice for checking reason's overly ambitious claims about God.
Date
2010-DecemberType
textIdentifier
oai:ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk:uuid:bed0f841-a3be-4653-8d19-03ab5499796adoi: 10.1007/s11153-010-9245-6
eissn: 1572-8684
ora:4652
http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/religious+studies/journal/11153
urn:uuid:bed0f841-a3be-4653-8d19-03ab5499796a
Oxford Research Archive internal ID: ora:4652
DOI
10.1007/s11153-010-9245-6ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s11153-010-9245-6