Author(s)
Tupa, AntonKeywords
AnalogyKilling
Life
Mortality
Pregnancy
Right to Life
Philosophical Ethics
Moral and Religious Aspects of Abortion
Prolongation of Life and Euthanasia
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Killing,+letting+die,+and+the+mortality+of+abortion&title=Journal+of+Applied+Philosophy+&volume=26&issue=1&date=2009-02&au=Tupa,+Antonhttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/951815
Abstract
David Boonin, in his A Defense of Abortion, argues that abortions that involve killing the foetus are morally permissible, even if granting for the sake of argument that the foetus has a right to life. His primary argument is an argument by analogy to a 'trolley case'. I offer two lines of counterargument to his argument by analogy. First, I argue that Boonin's analogy between his trolley case and a normal unwanted pregnancy does not hold. I revise his trolley case in light of my objections. Second, I argue that Boonin's arguments for the permissibility of killing, when applied to this revised trolley case ? and by extension, typical unwanted pregnancies ? do not succeed in justifying killing.Date
2016-01-08Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/951815Journal of Applied Philosophy 2009 February; 26(1): 1-26
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Killing,+letting+die,+and+the+mortality+of+abortion&title=Journal+of+Applied+Philosophy+&volume=26&issue=1&date=2009-02&au=Tupa,+Anton
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/951815