Author(s)
August, K.Keywords
KantArchitecture
Architecture Theory
Aesthetics
Kantian Aestetics
Philosophy
Cultivation of the Self
Foucault
Hadot
Ethics
Nimbleness
Beauty
Judgment
Critique of Judment
Kant's third Critique
Normalization
Le Corbusier
Ando
Tate Modern
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
In the aftermath of a normalized Foucaultian world with an all encompassing web of biopower, one remaining hope is to cultivate nimbleness. Nimbleness is an embodied aesthetic sensitivity to the material presence. Cultivating nimbleness is a particular style of cultivation; it is to willfully gather together one’s self in the wake of a formative force far richer than the derivative web of living power relationships of human embeddness within a horizon of social, economical, political and historical subjectivating power relations; which are chronicled and labeled by Michel Foucault as the normalizing practices of biopower. In other words to have freedom, one must start by rejecting the categories and labels normally internalized in order to relearn to learn from the material presence. Such a style of cultivation is a means of resisting normalizing power relations which co-opt cultivating practices to engross their own dominance which has had the by-product of an impotence to negate the gross material injustices present. This normalizing style of cultivation is a prevalent, corrupted, semblance which denies the importance of beauty for that of efficiency, rejects non-human purposiveness, and limits its measure of ethics to short term economical pragmatism. The thesis acknowledges that something is awry with the world and that giving care to beauty might help. The aim is to examine the event of Beauty as depicted by the philosopher Immanuel Kant and to apply this characterization to elective architectural spaces such that it may motivate individuals to cultivate their own nimbleness in relation to a formative force of nature. However given the revealed need for sensitivity to the particular material presence, the thesis can not be a rule book or catalog for beautiful design. Rather it is a rehabilitation for architects who are already heterospatially curious, with the desired outcome of architects cultivating their own nimbleness to reflectively judge as a ground up, multi-node, rhizomatic means of resistance to normalizing power practices as manifest in bad architecture.Date
2013-12-02Type
doctoralThesisIdentifier
oai:tudelft.nl:uuid:c4a599db-c70e-436c-8b1f-9418cd065476uuid:c4a599db-c70e-436c-8b1f-9418cd065476
http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:c4a599db-c70e-436c-8b1f-9418cd065476