Author(s)
Davison, AKeywords
370402 Social and Cultural Geography440104 Applied Ethics (incl. Bioethics and Environmental Ethics)
environmental philosophy
philosophy of technology
environmetnalism
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://eprints.utas.edu.au/1518/1/DPP_2003.pdfAbstract
Given the energy expended within dominant Cartesian epistemologies constructing and policing conceptual boundaries between the natural and the cultural - energies joined, paradoxically, to the pragmatic Baconian colonisation of nature - the terms environment and technology have come to share an interesting convergence. First, both have become amorphous and diffuse, referring to ubiquitous conditions in human experience. Langdon Winner's pronouncement in 1977 that technology "has come to mean everything and anything; it therefore threatens to mean nothing" is relevant still. It is increasingly true also of the functioning of the term environment, an observation that goes some way in explaining the centrifugal forces currently disintegrating and dispersing environmental discourses.Date
2003Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:1518http://eprints.utas.edu.au/1518/1/DPP_2003.pdf
Davison, A (2003) Rapt in technology. Design Philosophy Papers, 1 (4). ISSN 1448-7136