• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Deutsch 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Einloggen
Dokumentanzeige 
  •   DSpace Startseite
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Law, Democracy & Development
  • Dokumentanzeige
  •   DSpace Startseite
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Law, Democracy & Development
  • Dokumentanzeige
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Stöbern

Gesamter BestandBereiche & SammlungenErscheinungsdatumTitelnSchlagwortenAutorenDiese SammlungErscheinungsdatumTitelnSchlagwortenAutorenProfilesView

Mein Benutzerkonto

Einloggen

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

The state of civil society participation in Parliament

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Muntingh, L

Full record
Zur Langanzeige
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/65845
Online Access
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ldd/article/view/79773
Abstract
This article explores the extent of public participation in the legislative, oversight and accountability mandates of Parliament. From the analysis of data on public participation in the work of Parliament the key conclusion is drawn that the current state of public participation is almost exclusively focussed on the legislative mandate and that public participation in relation to the accountability and oversight mandates of Parliament is extremely limited.  Defining a new legal order for South Africa based on the Constitution after 1994 required Parliament to finalise hundreds of pieces of legislation in a relatively short period of time. In completing this momentous task, the oversight mandate of Parliament was neglected and consequently public involvement in respect of Parliament’s oversight mandate.  However, the lessons learnt and jurisprudence that has emerged from the 15-year focus on legislation has provided valuable guidelines in deepening participatory democracy in South Africa. The right to public participation in the work of Parliament has now been consolidated based on the Doctors for Life and King decisions, which are discussed in the article. The next challenge is for the public to utilise this right in order to support and strengthen the manner in which Parliament fulfils its oversight mandate.
Date
2012-04-05
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Identifier
oai:ojs.ajol.info:article/79773
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ldd/article/view/79773
10.4314/ldd.v16i1.2
Copyright/License
Copyright for the journal is owned by the journal and the authors of the articles
Collections
Law, Democracy & Development

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Kontakt
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.