• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Li, Rebecca H
Wacholtz, Mary C
Barnes, Mark
Boggs, Liam
Callery-D'Amico, Susan
Davis, Amy
Digilova, Alla
Forster, David
Heffernan, Kate
Luthin, Maeve
Lynch, Holly Fernandez
McNair, Lindsay
Miller, Jennifer E
Murphy, Jacquelyn
Van Campen, Luann
Wilenzick, Mark
Wolf, Delia
Woolston, Cris
Aldinger, Carmen
Bierer, Barbara E
Show allShow less
Keywords
Clinical Ethics
Clinical trials
Ethics
Ethics Committees/Consultation

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/669105
Online Access
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26859861
Abstract
A novel Protocol Ethics Tool Kit (‘Ethics Tool Kit’) has been developed by a multi-stakeholder group of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard. The purpose of the Ethics Tool Kit is to facilitate effective recognition, consideration and deliberation of critical ethical issues in clinical trial protocols. The Ethics Tool Kit may be used by investigators and sponsors to develop a dedicated Ethics Section within a protocol to improve the consistency and transparency between clinical trial protocols and research ethics committee reviews. It may also streamline ethics review and may facilitate and expedite the review process by anticipating the concerns of ethics committee reviewers. Specific attention was given to issues arising in multinational settings. With the use of this Tool Kit, researchers have the opportunity to address critical research ethics issues proactively, potentially speeding the time and easing the process to final protocol approval.
Date
2016-05-02
Type
Journal Article
Identifier
oai:dash.harvard.edu:1/26859861
Li, R. H., M. C. Wacholtz, M. Barnes, L. Boggs, S. Callery-D'Amico, A. Davis, A. Digilova, et al. 2016. “Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees.” Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (4): 229-234. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102540.
0306-6800
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26859861
Copyright/License
open
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare

    Ferus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)
    Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
  • Thumbnail

    Ethical Issues in the Big Data Industry

    Martin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)
    Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
  • Thumbnail

    But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate Domain

    Smith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)
    Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.