Online Access
https:dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856792http://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/245200
Abstract
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Basic and Applied Social Psychology
 Volume 36, Issue 1, 2014, 91-98, © 2014 Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01973533.2013.856792.Zhong and Liljenquist (2006) reported evidence of a “Macbeth Effect” in social psychology: a threat to people's moral purity leads them to seek, literally, to cleanse themselves. In an attempt to build upon these findings, we conducted a series of direct replications of Study 2 from Z&L's seminal report. We used Z&L's original materials and methods, investigated samples that were more representative of the general population, investigated samples from different countries and cultures, and substantially increased the power of our statistical tests. Despite multiple good-faith efforts, however, we were unable to detect a “Macbeth Effect” in any of our experiments. We discuss these findings in the context of recent concerns about replicability in the field of experimental social psychology.
Date
2014-03-05Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:dspace5-production:1810/245200Basic and Applied Social Psychology 36: 1, 91-98 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2013.856792
http:dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856792
http://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/245200