• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Sykepleiere i alternativ behandling. Hvorfor velger offentlig godkjente sykepleiere å tilby alternativ behandling?

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Johannessen, Berit
Keywords
VDP::Humaniora: 000::Kulturvitenskap: 060
VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801
VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808
VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/711983
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/1956/1903
Abstract
This thesis is about nurses who choose to offer CAM (Complementary and Alternative
 Medicine). The main questions to be answered is this : why do nurses choose to offer CAM
 and how can their choices be understood? The questions are of current interest because of the general increase of CAM, the large number of nurses who quit their jobs in the public health service and the widespread of New Age. Recent research shows that nurses have a positive attitude toward CAM. This is a thesis with both a nursing and a cultural science perspective. Field research was chosen as empirical method for collecting data, this included interviews,
 participant observations and text/document analysis. The informants were registered nurses who offered CAM. Chapter three is a text analysis of actual hearings (from nurses, doctors and CAM organisations) on two important public documents: “NOU 1998: Alternative Medicine” and “Law on Alternative Treatment- 2003”. This analysis shows that the three groups make a point of different things. The doctors are occupied with the importance of scientific proof of
 effect, the registered nurses emphasize the need for cooperation and responsibility and the CAM practitioners feel oppressed. The concept of holism was considered a core concept, and chapter four is an analysis of this concept in view of nursing theory and New Age. Holism is further discussed in view of empirical data and shows how “alternative nurses” have an ecospiritual worldview. Chapter five shows how “alternative nurses” focus “to develop Self” as an important aspect of both illness and treatment. Chapter six discusses how alternative
 nurses´s choice to work with CAM affects their professional identity. Choosing CAM
 strengthen their identity as nurses because of its focus on holism and self healing. One of the reasons why “alternative nurses” choose to offer CAM is expressed by its possibility to work independent. This is discussed in chapter seven which focus on three main distinctions in the Norwegian health care service. These three distinctions are : care- cure, nurse- doctor and masculine-feminine. By choosing CAM as independent health workers the “alternative
 nurses” challenge these distinctions.
 Chapter eight is concerned with this question: Are nurses who choose CAM contributing to a growing health market which encourage medicalisation ? The last chapter in the thesis is concerned with the consequences of the empirical findings and have several suggestions for further research, like for instance the blurred connections between nursing and CAM, nursing
 and religion and between care and cure.
Date
2006-10-17
Type
Doctoral thesis
Identifier
oai:bora.uib.no:1956/1903
82-308-0240-8 (print version)
http://hdl.handle.net/1956/1903
Copyright/License
All rights reserved
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.