Contributor(s)
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.920.7861http://jme.bmj.com/content/40/5/336.full.pdf
Abstract
Some bioethicists have questioned the desirability of a line of biomedical research aimed at extending the length of our lives over what some think to be its natural limit. In particular, Leon Kass has argued that living longer is not such a great advantage, and that mortality is not a burden after all. In this essay, I evaluate his arguments in favour of such a counterintuitive view by elaborating upon some critical remarks advanced by John Harris. Ultimately, I argue that nothing substantial has been said by Kass to undermine the desirability of life-extending technologies. This paper is a contribution to the current debate on the moral permissibility of a certain subset of technological enhancements; in particular, thoseDate
2016-09-26Type
textIdentifier
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.920.7861http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.920.7861