• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS The Efficacy of the Association of Art Museum Directors Online Antiquities Registry

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Cathleen Hagen
Brian I. Daniels
Alyssa Cathleen Hagen
Brian I. Daniels
Contributor(s)
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/740666
Online Access
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.922.3197
https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/37411/PDF/1/
Abstract
High-profile international legal suits and the gradual establishment of legal precedence for repa-triation cases in the U.S. under the National Stolen Property Act and the Cultural Property Implementation Act of 1983 have coincided with the Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD) adopting codes of ethics and recommended guidelines for member museum acquisi-tions. When the AAMD Subcommittee on the Acquisition of Archaeological Materials and Ancient Art issued its 2008 report, it established the online Registry of New Acquisitions of Archaeological Material and Works of Ancient Art to help member museums efficiently dis-seminate information about recent acquisitions with incomplete provenance. This is the first systematic analysis of its contents. Using data from 325 listings (as of January 2012) by eleven participating institutions, this paper argues that museums are not sufficiently vigilant about following the AAMD’s 2008 guidelines. ii
Date
2016-09-26
Type
text
Identifier
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.922.3197
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.922.3197
Copyright/License
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.