• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Conceptual learning of fundamentals in electric circuits: Student misconceptions, textbooks, and multi-perspective conceptual change

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Sangam, Deepika
Contributor(s)
Brent K. Jesiek
Keywords
Education, Sciences|Education, Curriculum and Instruction

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/772047
Online Access
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3544363
Abstract
Student difficulties with fundamental electric circuit principles are often attributed to everyday interactions with electricity and the abstract nature of the associated concepts. In light of these difficulties, numerous studies have focused on identifying student difficulties, misconceptions, understanding the conceptual change process, and developing effective ways to teach. However, many related areas of research remain under-explored, such as investigating the efficacy of textbooks in conceptual learning, and more comprehensively examining the nature of students' conceptual development. This research begins to address these gaps through three interrelated studies. Study 1 systematically compares four existing concept inventories, and then uses one of the leading instruments (DIRECT v1.0) to identify difficult concepts among first-year engineering students. The results showed that first-year engineering students on average scored less than 65%, confirming that students entering ECE programs have significant conceptual difficulties. Study 2 presents an analysis of six popular circuit theory textbooks to determine their role in student conceptual learning, including treatment of difficult concepts. Study 3 investigates undergraduate students' fundamental conceptions of electric circuits at different levels of study in an Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) program. This research analyzes students' conceptions using a multi-perspective framework that brings together epistemological, ontological and social/affective perspectives. From an epistemological perspective, status (intelligible, plausible, fruitful) of students' conception is used as a measure of conceptual understanding. From an ontological perspective, students' ontological commitments are determined by examining verbal predicates usage when discussing notions of electric current. The social/affective perspective examines the role of student interest, motivation and background. This approach to analyzing students' conceptions provides a more holistic view of the effect of different instructional experience in ECE programs on conceptual learning. As reported, for example, Study 3 demonstrates that with experience in ECE, though students' conceptual understanding characteristics (conceptual status, ontological attributes) show a positive trend towards scientific understanding, their personal interest and motivation appear to be the key factors that eventually lead to conceptual change. These findings are directly applicable to instruction design, and as a foundation for future research that can use this analysis framework to study the effectiveness of conceptual change pedagogies.^
Date
2012-01-01
Type
text
Identifier
oai:docs.lib.purdue.edu:dissertations-12481
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3544363
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.