Using Peer Feedback to Enhance the Quality of Student Online Postings: An Exploratory Study
Author(s)
Ertmer, Peggy A.Richardson, Jennifer C.
Belland, Brian Robert
Camin, Denise
Connolly, Patrick
Coulthard, Glen
Lei, Kimfong
Mong, Christopher
Keywords
peerfeedback
quality
student
online postings
exploratory study
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Instructional Media Design
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://works.bepress.com/brian_belland/8Abstract
This study investigates the impact of peer feedback used as an instructional strategy to increase the quality of students' online postings. While peer feedback has been demonstrated to support students' learning in traditional classrooms, little is known about its efficacy in online discussions. To address this gap, we examined students' perceptions of the value of giving and receiving peer feedback, specifically related to the quality of discussion postings in an online course. In addition, we investigated the impact of that feedback by comparing the quality of students' postings, based on Bloom's taxonomy, from pre-course to post-course. Results suggest that the quality of students' postings was maintained through the use of peer feedback despite students' preferences for instructor feedback. Students noted that peer feedback can be valuable and, more importantly, described how giving peer feedback not only reinforced their learning but enabled them to achieve higher understanding.Date
2007-01-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:works.bepress.com:brian_belland-1007http://works.bepress.com/brian_belland/8