• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Codes of Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Codes of Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

1977 Code of Ethics for Arbitrators: An Outside Perspective, The Symposium: Ethics in a World of Mandatory Arbitration

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Feerick, John D.
Keywords
Alternative Dispute Resolution
ADR
ethical standards
ethical guidelines
mandatory arbitration
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Law

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/83350
Online Access
http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/277
http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1276&context=faculty_scholarship
Abstract
If ADR is to remain a vibrant part of the judicial landscape, it is essential that efforts further shape ethical standards and guidelines, as well as their practical connotations. The framers of the United States Constitution were very careful to establish a public justice system comprised of judges and juries operating within a framework of standards and protections designed to assure justice and fairness while simultaneously promoting public confidence. We should give similar care to developing processes through which we purportedly intend to accomplish similar objectives in resolving disputes and controversies. At the very least, the private nature of these processes and the limited reviewability of such adjudicative results demand heightened scrutiny of ethical matters. However, in a nation that places a premium on individual freedom and encourages less formal means of dispute resolution, parties' choice of dispute resolution mechanisms deserves great respect.
Date
2001-01-01
Type
text
Identifier
oai:ir.lawnet.fordham.edu:faculty_scholarship-1276
http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/277
http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1276&context=faculty_scholarship
Collections
Codes of Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.