Author(s)Haverford College. Honor Council
Full recordShow full item record
Abstract[Professor Lambeau] confronted [Will] about accessing outside sources on a midterm and final, and plagiarism on a paper for [Custodial Training 200]. In his statement, [Will] said he had no intention of plagiarizing on the paper. He did not remember accessing outside sources on the midterm, but did remember accessing them during the final, although he did not think he had gained any information from them that he used in the final. Because the confronted party strongly wanted the trial to take place during the summer, it was difficult to convene a full jury for an academic trial1. After discussing the situation at length, Honor Council consented to send the case to a joint student/administration panel with the consent of both parties. The jury consisted of two honor council members, four community jurors, and two deans.