• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Codes of Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Codes of Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Humanidad con fin, justificación de principios kantianos de justicia y diferencia deontológica: una teoría kantiana de la acción para los fundamentos del argumento contractualista-constructivista político

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Marey, Macarena
Keywords
Kant; justificación de principios de justicia; pluralismo
justification of principles of Justice; pluralism; Humanidades; Filosofía; filosofía del Derecho; principio general del Derecho; ética

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/85789
Online Access
http://www.repositorium.org/repositorium/oai/viewrecord.php?id=348905
Abstract
El objetivo de este artículo es exponer un paso argumental para una justificación kantiana de la aplicación jurídico-política del principio de la humanidad que sea plenamente compatible con la tesis de la diferencia deontológica entre ética y derecho. Dicho paso se ubica en el nivel metaético de justificación de los principios de justicia en el marco del contrato originario. Específicamente, mi tesis interpretativa consiste en que este nivel se inicia con una teoría de la acción por la cual la descripción de los rasgos de los agentes o personas que participan de él resulta compatible con el "hecho del pluralismo". The aim of this paper is to develop a step within the justificatory argumentation that bases the juridical-political application of the principle of humanity in a way that makes it fully compatible with the thesis of the deontological distinction between ethics and law. This step belongs to the metaethical level that serves to justify Kant\'s principles of justice within the original contract. Specifically, my interpretative thesis holds that this level begins with a theory of action by which the description of the agents or persons that participate in the contract is fully compatible with the fact of pluralism.
Date
2011-05-23
Type
Articulo
Identifier
oai:harvester.repositorium.org:record/348905
http://www.repositorium.org/repositorium/oai/viewrecord.php?id=348905
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5)
Collections
Codes of Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.