Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRA Koen
dc.contributor.authorAJ Hamman
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-24T06:58:46Z
dc.date.available2019-10-24T06:58:46Z
dc.date.created2017-01-18 00:03
dc.date.issued2012-12-01
dc.identifieroai:doaj.org/article:077aa806c4c04cad801cd7089279846d
dc.identifier1727-3781
dc.identifierhttps://doaj.org/article/077aa806c4c04cad801cd7089279846d
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/860867
dc.description.abstractThe attorney’s trust account is an enticing prospect for criminals seeking ways to launder money acquired illegally, and the attorney whose trust account is abused in this way stands to be branded and punished as a money launderer. The overall aim of the article is to identify the dangers which money launderers pose to attorneys and to highlight the need for vigilance in the face of these dangers. It analyses the anti-money laundering reporting obligations imposed on attorneys by the Financial Intelligence Centre Act and considers impact of these obligations upon the attorney-client relationship. Some of the ways in which a law practice may become implicated in the placement, layering and integration stages of the money laundering process are discussed, and cases which deal with attorneys’ involvement in money laundering schemes are presented.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.languageAfrikaans
dc.languageDutch
dc.languageGerman
dc.publisherNorth-West University
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://www.nwu.ac.za/af/webfm_send/60610
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/1727-3781
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND
dc.sourcePotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol 15, Iss 5, Pp 68-100 (2012)
dc.subjecttrust account
dc.subjectattorneys
dc.subjectmoney laundering
dc.subjectFICA
dc.subjectconfidentiality
dc.subjectlegal professional privilege
dc.subjectreporting obligations
dc.subjectcash threshold
dc.subjectsuspicious transaction
dc.subjecttipping off
dc.subjectLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
dc.subjectK1-7720
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectK
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law and Political Science
dc.subjectLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
dc.subjectK1-7720
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectK
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law and Political Science
dc.subjectLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
dc.subjectK1-7720
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectK
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law and Political Science
dc.subjectLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
dc.subjectK1-7720
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectK
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law
dc.subjectDOAJ:Law and Political Science
dc.subjectLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
dc.subjectK1-7720
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectK
dc.subjectLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
dc.subjectK1-7720
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectK
dc.subjectLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
dc.subjectK1-7720
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectK
dc.titleCAVE PECUNIAM: LAWYERS AS LAUNDERERS
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncodeOAIDATA
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:10462138
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/10462138
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-01-18 00:03
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid148947
ge.oai.repositoryid52
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Law
ge.oai.setnameDOAJ:Law
ge.oai.setnameDOAJ:Law and Political Science
ge.oai.setspecTENDOkxhdyBpbiBnZW5lcmFsLiBDb21wYXJhdGl2ZSBhbmQgdW5pZm9ybSBsYXcuIEp1cmlzcHJ1ZGVuY2U~
ge.oai.setspecTENDOkxhdw~~
ge.oai.setspecRE9BSjpMYXc~
ge.oai.setspecRE9BSjpMYXcgYW5kIFBvbGl0aWNhbCBTY2llbmNl
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttps://doaj.org/article/077aa806c4c04cad801cd7089279846d


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record