• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • русский 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Войти
Просмотр элемента 
  •   Главная
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Просмотр элемента
  •   Главная
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Просмотр элемента
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Просмотр

Весь DSpaceСообщества и коллекцииДата публикацииНазванияТематикаАвторыЭта коллекцияДата публикацииНазванияТематикаАвторыProfilesView

Моя учетная запись

ВойтиРегистрация

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Fuzzy Law and the Boundaries of Secularism

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
W Menski
Keywords
Secularism
legal pluralism
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
Show allShow less

Full record
Показать полную информацию
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/860980
Online Access
https://doaj.org/article/0345c8f3775c4c22a9cb770d4d0338a8
Abstract
The author delivered a speech at a Religare Conference. Showing his distaste for fuzzy law, he argues that "moderate secularism" is not merely another fuzzy concept, but it is "super-fuzzy", and that lawyers claiming to love certainty "have a tendency to sit in judgment over matters and even pre-judge things they know little about, including legal pluralism" leading to much irritation.
Date
2010-12-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:doaj.org/article:0345c8f3775c4c22a9cb770d4d0338a8
1727-3781
https://doaj.org/article/0345c8f3775c4c22a9cb770d4d0338a8
Copyright/License
CC BY-NC-ND
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    CAVE PECUNIAM: LAWYERS AS LAUNDERERS

    RA Koen; AJ Hamman (North-West University, 2012-12-01)
    The attorney’s trust account is an enticing prospect for criminals seeking ways to launder money acquired illegally, and the attorney whose trust account is abused in this way stands to be branded and punished as a money launderer. The overall aim of the article is to identify the dangers which money launderers pose to attorneys and to highlight the need for vigilance in the face of these dangers. It analyses the anti-money laundering reporting obligations imposed on attorneys by the Financial Intelligence Centre Act and considers impact of these obligations upon the attorney-client relationship. Some of the ways in which a law practice may become implicated in the placement, layering and integration stages of the money laundering process are discussed, and cases which deal with attorneys’ involvement in money laundering schemes are presented.
  • Thumbnail

    Interpretation of the Constitutional provisions relating to international law

    M Olivier (North-West University, 2003-03-01)
    Colloquium presentation - no abstract available
  • Thumbnail

    Parallel Planning Mechanisms as a "Recipe for Disaster"

    J van Wyk (North-West University, 2010-05-01)
    This note offers a critical reflection of the recent landmark decision in City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal which lay to rest the negative consequences of employing the DFA procedures of the Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995 (DFA) alongside those of the provincial Ordinances to establish townships (or to use DFA parlance, “land development areas”). The welcome and timely decision in City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal has declared invalid chapters V and VI of the DFA. Moreover, it has formalised planning terminology in South Africa, delineated the boundaries of “municipal planning” and “urban planning and development” as listed in Schedules 4 and 5 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and, in the process, clarified the structure of planning law. This note examines the decision of the SCA and focus on the role it will clearly have in reforming some of the law relating to planning. It considers the facts of the case, uncertainties around terminology, the structure of planning in South Africa, the content of municipal planning, the role of the DFA and the consequences of the declaration of invalidity by the SCA.
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Контакты
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.