• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • 中文 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • 登入
查看項目 
  •   首頁
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • 查看項目
  •   首頁
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • 查看項目
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

瀏覽

所有文獻群體出版日期標題主題作者此合集出版日期標題主題作者個人檔案檢視

我的帳號

登入註冊

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Fuzzy Law and the Boundaries of Secularism

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
W Menski
Keywords
Secularism
legal pluralism
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
DOAJ:Law
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Law
K
Show allShow less

所有記錄
顯示完整的項目記錄
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/860980
Online Access
https://doaj.org/article/0345c8f3775c4c22a9cb770d4d0338a8
Abstract
The author delivered a speech at a Religare Conference. Showing his distaste for fuzzy law, he argues that "moderate secularism" is not merely another fuzzy concept, but it is "super-fuzzy", and that lawyers claiming to love certainty "have a tendency to sit in judgment over matters and even pre-judge things they know little about, including legal pluralism" leading to much irritation.
Date
2010-12-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:doaj.org/article:0345c8f3775c4c22a9cb770d4d0338a8
1727-3781
https://doaj.org/article/0345c8f3775c4c22a9cb770d4d0338a8
Copyright/License
CC BY-NC-ND
合集
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 

相關項目

顯示與標題,作者,創作者和主題相關的項目。

  • 縮圖

    CAVE PECUNIAM: LAWYERS AS LAUNDERERS

    RA Koen; AJ Hamman (North-West University, 2012-12-01)
    The attorney’s trust account is an enticing prospect for criminals seeking ways to launder money acquired illegally, and the attorney whose trust account is abused in this way stands to be branded and punished as a money launderer. The overall aim of the article is to identify the dangers which money launderers pose to attorneys and to highlight the need for vigilance in the face of these dangers. It analyses the anti-money laundering reporting obligations imposed on attorneys by the Financial Intelligence Centre Act and considers impact of these obligations upon the attorney-client relationship. Some of the ways in which a law practice may become implicated in the placement, layering and integration stages of the money laundering process are discussed, and cases which deal with attorneys’ involvement in money laundering schemes are presented.
  • 縮圖

    Interpretation of the Constitutional provisions relating to international law

    M Olivier (North-West University, 2003-03-01)
    Colloquium presentation - no abstract available
  • 縮圖

    Parallel Planning Mechanisms as a "Recipe for Disaster"

    J van Wyk (North-West University, 2010-05-01)
    This note offers a critical reflection of the recent landmark decision in City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal which lay to rest the negative consequences of employing the DFA procedures of the Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995 (DFA) alongside those of the provincial Ordinances to establish townships (or to use DFA parlance, “land development areas”). The welcome and timely decision in City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal has declared invalid chapters V and VI of the DFA. Moreover, it has formalised planning terminology in South Africa, delineated the boundaries of “municipal planning” and “urban planning and development” as listed in Schedules 4 and 5 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and, in the process, clarified the structure of planning law. This note examines the decision of the SCA and focus on the role it will clearly have in reforming some of the law relating to planning. It considers the facts of the case, uncertainties around terminology, the structure of planning in South Africa, the content of municipal planning, the role of the DFA and the consequences of the declaration of invalidity by the SCA.
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
快速指南 | 聯絡我們
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

導出搜尋結果

導出選項允許您將輸入的查詢所產生的搜尋結果導出到一個檔案中。有不同的格式可以選擇下載。要導出項目,請點擊與最佳下載格式相對應的按鈕。

預設情況下,點擊導出按鈕會導致進行系統允許下,下載最大數量的項目。

要選擇搜索結果的子集,請點擊「選擇性導出」按鈕,然後選擇要導出的項目。每次可以導出的項目數量與完全導出受到同樣的限制。

"

作出選擇後,點擊其中一個導出格式按鈕。導出格式旁邊的氣泡中會顯示即將導出的項目數量。

"