A Critical Appraisal of Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability V Government of the Republic of South Africa
Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability v Government of The Republic of South Africa
Education White Paper 6: Special Needs Education
White Paper 6
Right to Education
Integrated National Disability Strategy
profoundly and severe disability
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Eldridge v British Columbia (Attorney General)
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractThe 2011 the Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability v Government of The Republic of South Africa case flagged a lot of issues faced by persons with disabilities relating to access to education in South Africa. The case tackled certain perceptions about the ineducability of persons with profound and severe disability and the remaining charity-oriented perception by the South African Department of Basic Education. While the court made several important points in advancing universal access to education, the author argues that certain holes in the judgment hinders the existence of judicial finding truly infused with concerns of substantive equality. An example of this short-coming is the court's consideration of reasonableness when the right to basic education is an immediately realisable right. The author also argues that the South African developments in education policy for persons with disability, while positive, is insufficient to truly give effect to substantive equality – the claim to equality being made in the new constitutional dispensation. There is still an attitude that is too permissive of separating students based on abilism. The social model of thinking about requires a complete transformation of the education system that would not require a classification of learners by abilities but have a different constitution so as to accommodate all students and not unduly enable one group over another. The author considers the approaches from Canada and India to explore its responses to education for students with varying levels of ability. Canada's similar conception of equality and India's influence on South African constitutionalism and shared experience with massive equality gaps make these jurisdictions instructive.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Disability in the Palestinian TerritoriesWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-10-18)This assessment originated from the
dialogue on reforming the Cash Transfer Program (CTP)
managed by the Ministry of Social Affairs (MOSA) to increase
monetary support for people with disabilities (PWD).
According to the beneficiaries, the current benefit payment
is not sufficient to address the special needs of a
household with a member with disability. In response to the
demand of the beneficiaries, the MOSA considered additional
compensation for vulnerable households including PWD; an
analysis was conducted to weight the costs and benefits of
modifying the targeting formula to accommodate additional
compensation for PWD. The results did not support increasing
the monetary compensation because the costs of adjustment
were expected to outweigh the benefits and do so at the
expense of larger number of poor beneficiaries. Furthermore,
global evidence suggests that cash transfers are not
necessarily the sole or right instrument to address the
needs of PWD in an adequate manner. Rather, meeting the
needs requires a holistic approach with greater focus on
providing services complemented by temporary cash benefits.
Also, compensating only by cash is not sustainable.
Supporting Career Development and Employment: Benefits Planning, Assistance and Outreach (BPA&O) and Protection and Advocacy for Beneficiaries of Social Security (PABSS)Golden, Thomas P.; O’Mara, Susan; Ferrell, Connie; Sheldon, James R.; Miller, Lucy Axton (DigitalCommons@ILR, 2005-01-01)This training curriculum is dedicated to increasing knowledge and understanding of the Social Security Administration's disability and return to work programs and work incentive provisions as prescribed in the Social Security Act and Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 as well as other federal benefit programs. These informational resources were compiled and edited to provide continuing education and print materials for benefits specialists and protection and advocacy personnel on the interplay of these benefit programs and impact or employment.
Universal Access-NY User’s GuideBrewer, David (DigitalCommons@ILR, 2005-01-01)What is Universal Access-NY? Universal Access-NY is a complete online planning toolkit, www.UniversalAccessNY.org, where a One-Stop Delivery System can assess its practices, and develop work plans to improve physical and programmatic accessibility for all One-Stop customers. This web site and manual was developed by Cornell University’s Employment and Disability Institute, through the support and guidance of the New York State Department of Labor, with funding from two U.S. Department of Labor Work Incentive Grants (WIG 1 and 2). This web site was designed for use in a collaborative manner, bringing together One-Stop personnel, agency partners, business leaders and customers with disabilities. Universal Access-NY supports continuous improvement, with features that encourage multiple uses and incremental systems change.