• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Simplifying linearizability proofs with reduction and abstraction

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Tayfun Elmas
Shaz Qadeer
Ali Sezgin
Omer Subasi
Serdar Tasiran
Contributor(s)
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/861338
Online Access
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.184.4285
http://theorem.ku.edu.tr/files/pubs/elmas_qadeer_sezgin_subasi_tasiran_tacas10.pdf
Abstract
Abstract. The typical proof of linearizability establishes an abstraction map from the concurrent program to a sequential specification, and identifies the commit points of operations. If the concurrent program uses fine-grained concurrency and complex synchronization, constructing such a proof is difficult. We propose a sound proof system that significantly simplifies the reasoning about linearizability. Linearizability is proved by transforming an implementation into its specification within this proof system. The proof system combines reduction and abstraction, which increase the granularity of atomic actions, with variable introduction and hiding, which relate the synchronization mechanism of the implementation to that of the specification. We construct the abstraction map incrementally, and eliminate the need to reason about the location of commit points in the implementation. We have implemented our method in the QED verifier and demonstrate its effecacy and practicality on several highly-concurrent examples from the literature. 1
Date
2011-03-22
Type
text
Identifier
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.184.4285
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.184.4285
Copyright/License
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.