• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Student Interaction and Knowledge Construction in Case-Based Learning in Educational Psychology using Online Discussions: The Role of Structure

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Pena-Shaff, Judith
Altman, William

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/864452
Online Access
http://editlib.org/p/114358
Abstract
The authors analyzed students’ patterns of interaction and knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions of cases in two Educational Psychology classes. They performed quantitative analyses of the outlines of postings and transcripts of online messages from group discussions to determine participation and interaction rates, and qualitative analyses of patterns of interaction and knowledge construction. They found statements of clarification, elaboration, and interpretation with grounds appeared to be most directly related to the knowledge construction process. This process appeared to be mainly self-reflective, even when it began by acknowledging others’ contributions or clarifying information to others. Scaffolding, via the gradual posting of questions to help guide the online discussions, might have been more effective in helping students construct the conceptual space, create relationships between conceptual knowledge and facts, and evaluate solutions than posing all guiding questions at once. Although online participation and interaction in online discussions were positively correlated with mean exam scores, this relationship was stronger in the class where online discussion proceeded gradually. The authors discuss implications for teaching and further research.
Date
2015-07
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:editlib.org:p/114358
http://editlib.org/p/114358
Copyright/License
Copyright (c) AACE. All rights reserved.
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.