• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • português (Brasil) 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Entrar
Ver item 
  •   Página inicial
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Ver item
  •   Página inicial
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Ver item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Navegar

Todo o repositórioComunidades e ColeçõesPor data do documentoTítulosAssuntosAutoresEsta coleçãoPor data do documentoTítulosAssuntosAutoresProfilesView

Minha conta

Entrar

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Technologies that Assist in Online Group Work: A Comparison of Synchronous and Asynchronous Computer Mediated Communication Technologies on Students’ Learning and Community

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Rockinson-Szapkiw, Amanda
Wendt, Jillian

Full record
Mostrar registro completo
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/864514
Online Access
http://editlib.org/p/147266
Abstract
While the benefits of online group work completed using asynchronous CMC technology is documented, researchers have identified a number of challenges that result in ineffective and unsuccessful online group work. Fewer channels of communication and lack of immediacy when compared to face-to-face group work are a few of the noted limitations. Thus, research is needed to improve the online group work experience. As computer-mediated communication (CMC) technology has been identified as a critical element in effective online education, this study examines if the type of CMC technology used to complete online group projects influences online graduate students’ course points and community of inquiry (i.e. social presence, cognitive presence, and teacher presence). A casual comparative research design and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used. Results yield a significant difference in three of the dependent variables based on the type of technology used for online group work. Student who used synchronous technologies had higher community of inquiry than students who used asynchronous technologies. There was no significant difference in course points between the two groups.
Date
2015-07
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:editlib.org:p/147266
http://editlib.org/p/147266
Copyright/License
Copyright (c) AACE. All rights reserved.
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Entre em contato
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.