Providing better services to all through the implementation of e-governance at the local government level in South Africa
Author(s)Mokgopo, T. I.
AbstractArticle published in: The 3rd Annual International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives 04 - 06 July 2018, Stellenbosch University, Saldahna Bay, South Africa
The sphere of local government in South Africa is often viewed as an institution that is closest to people. It is also perceived to be the first point of contact between members of community and government institutions. This means that most service delivery objectives that are contained in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa are achieved at the local government level, thereby making municipalities the most important institution in the country. This saw municipalities being able to touch any area or communities where the
national and provincial government cannot reach including disadvantage rural areas. Such development led to
the introduction of e-governance as a way of providing services to both public and private sector in the country. The main reason is that the internet has become an important way to conduct business and to communicate between government departments and members of the community. However, current evidence points to the fact that local governments worldwide, including South Africa, have been slow to respond to these developments:
the implementation of e-governance and use of internet to provide e-services. Based on that this paper advocates for the implementation of e-governance at the local government level in South Africa as a measure of improving and achieving Constitutional objectives of providing better services for all. This paper argues that through e-government or e-governance, municipalities will be in a better position to respond to service delivery challenges faced by members of the community because in itself (e-governance) public participation is achievable. The paper concludes that local e-governance is a better way of providing municipal services to different communities in the country.
Keywords: E-governance, E-government, Good governance, Implementation, Information technology, Local government
Growth without GovernanceKraay, Aart; Kaufmann, Daniel (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-01)It is well known that there is a strong positive correlation between per capita incomes and the quality of governance across countries. the authors propose an empirical strategy that allows separation of this correlation into (1) a strong positive causal effect running from better governance to higher per capita incomes, and, perhaps surprisingly at first, (2) a weak and even negative causal effect running in the opposite direction from per capita incomes to governance. The first result confirms existing evidence on the importance of good governance for economic development. The second result is new and suggests the absence of a "virtuous circle" in which higher incomes lead to further improvements in governance. This motivates the authors' choice of title, "Growth Without Governance." They document this evidence using a newly updated set of worldwide governance-indicators covering 175 countries for the period 2000-01, and use the results to interpret the relationship between incomes and governance focusing on the Latin America and Caribbean region-within a worldwide empirical context. Finally, the authors speculate about the potential importance of elite influence and state capture in accounting for the surprising negative effects of per capita incomes on governance, present some evidence on such capture in some Latin American countries, and suggest priorities for actions to improve governance when such pernicious elite influence shapes public policy.
Decentralization and Local Governance in MENA : A Survey of Policies, Institutions, and PracticesWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-21)Entering the 21st century, the 1999-2000 World Development Report (WDR), identifies two main forces that are shaping the world in which development policy is being defined and implemented: (i) globalization, the increasing worldwide integration of private sector interaction and commercial relationships; and (ii) localization, a process of devolving fiscal and administrative roles and responsibilities from central to sub-national tiers of government. It goes on to note that these global-private and local-public pressures are not only reinforcing, but also challenging traditional paradigms and forms of intergovernmental systems. Political decentralization, often associated with pluralistic politics and representative government, aims to give citizens more say in public policy and decision-making. Its advocates assume that decisions made with greater participation will be better informed and more relevant to diverse interests in society than those made only by national political authorities. The concept implies that the selection of representatives from local electoral jurisdictions allows citizens to know better their political representatives and allows elected officials to know better the needs and desires of their constituents. Administrative decentralization aims to redistribute authority, responsibility and financial resources for providing public services among different levels of government. It typically takes three forms: de-concentration, delegation and devolution. Fiscal decentralization vests greater autonomy and authority with local governments in matters of fiscal importance, empowering local governments to generate their own revenues, through taxes and user charges, as well as determining their expenditure priorities based on a clear assignment of functions and responsibilities. Over the last two decades, it has been estimated that more than 100 countries, most of them in the developing world, have experimented with various forms of decentralization.
Sub-National Performance Incentives in the Intergovernmental FrameworkSmoke, Paul; Lewis, Blane D. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-06)This paper provides background for the
Government of Indonesia as it considers if and how to
introduce more robust local government performance
incentives into the intergovernmental fiscal framework. The
next section briefly examines the forces that have driven
the recent national wave of interest in improving local
government performance. This is followed by a review of the
relatively limited set of local government performance
incentives currently in force in Indonesia. The fourth
section provides a conceptual overview of how to think about
the possible expansion of local government incentive
programs, outlining the potential role(s) of such programs
in general and the key issues involved in designing and
implementing them. The fifth section tentatively considers a
number of options for additional local government incentives
in Indonesia that the central government may wish to
consider pursuing. The paper concludes with an outline of
next steps for moving forward with the possible development
of more purposeful and meaningful performance incentives in
Indonesia's intergovernmental fiscal framework.