• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Responsible Leadership Collection
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Responsible Leadership Collection
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Public Spending and Outcomes: Does Governance Matter?

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Rajkumar, Andrew Sunil
Swaroop, Vinaya
Keywords
URBAN AREAS
EXPENDITURES
SOCIAL OUTCOMES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
PUBLIC HEALTH
POLITICAL RISK
PUBLIC POLICY
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
GOVERNANCE INDICATORS
CROWDING
BUREAUCRACY
GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS
PRIMARY EDUCATION
PRIMARY SCHOOL
FOREIGN AID
PARENTS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
GOOD GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
PURCHASING POWER PARITY
PUBLIC SPENDING
HEALTH EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC SECTOR
CORRUPTION
PER CAPITA INCOME
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
AGED
BUREAUCRATIC QUALITY
MORTALITY
REGULATORY BURDEN
INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL INEFFICIENCIES
POLITICAL STABILITY
DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS
EFFECTIVENESS
POLITICAL SYSTEM
LEGISLATURE
EXECUTION
CIVIL SOCIETY
SERVICE DELIVERY
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
LITERACY RATES
BUREAUCRACY & CORRUPT PRACTICES
GOVERNANCE
CORRUPTION IN POLITICS
BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
REVERSE CAUSATION
HEALTH STATUS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
HEALTH SPENDING
RULE OF LAW
CITIZENS
PURCHASING POWER
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
GOVERNANCE VARIABLES
LIFE EXPECTANCY
INCOME
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC AFFAIRS
GOVERNANCE INDICATOR
HEALTH OUTCOMES
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
DEBT
ALLOCATING PUBLIC RESOURCES
HUMAN RESOURCES
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
HEALTH SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR
ACCOUNTABILITY
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS
VIOLENCE PUBLIC SPENDING
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
PUBLIC RESOURCES
POLICY RESEARCH
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
INSTITUTIONAL VARIABLES
INFANT MORTALITY
MOTIVATION
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
COUNTRY DATA
INEQUALITY
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
GOVERNMENT SPENDING POLICY
URBANIZATION
PRIMARY EDUCATION
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/90014
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14248
Abstract
The authors examine the role of governance-measured by level of corruption and quality of bureaucracy-and ask how it affects the relationship between public spending and outcomes. Their main innovation is to see if differences in efficacy of public spending can be explained by quality of governance. The authors find that public health spending lowers child and infant mortality rates in countries with good governance. The results also indicate that as countries improve their governance, public spending on primary education becomes effective in increasing primary education attainment. These findings have important implications for enhancing the development effectiveness of public spending. The lessons are particularly relevant for developing countries, where public spending on education and health is relatively low, and the state of governance is often poor.
Date
2002-05
Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14248
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14248
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Collections
Responsible Leadership Collection

entitlement

 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Reprioritizing Government Spending on Health : Pushing an Elephant Up the Stairs?

    Fleisher, Lisa; Tandon, Ajay; Li, Rong; Yap, Wei Aun (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-04-16)
    Countries vary widely with respect to
 the share of government spending on health, a metric that
 can serve as a proxy for the extent to which health is
 prioritized by governments. World Health Organization (WHO)
 data estimate that, in 2011, health's share of
 aggregate government expenditure in the 170 countries for
 which data were available averaged 12 percent. However,
 country differences were striking: ranging from a low of 1
 percent in Myanmar to a high of 28 percent in Costa Rica.
 Some of the observed differences in health's share of
 government spending across countries are unsurprisingly
 related to differences in national income. However,
 significant variations exist in health's share of
 government spending even after controlling for national
 income. This paper provides a global overview of
 health's share of government spending and summarizes
 key theoretical and empirical perspectives on allocation of
 public resources to health vis-a-vis other sectors from the
 perspective of reprioritization, one of the modalities for
 realizing fiscal space for health. Theory and cross-country
 empirical analyses do not provide clear, cut explanations
 for the observed variations in government prioritization of
 health. Standard economic theory arguments that are often
 used to justify public financing for health are equally
 applicable to many other sectors including defense,
 education, and infrastructure. To date, empirical work on
 prioritization has been sparse: available cross-country
 econometric analyses suggests that factors such as
 democratization, lower levels of corruption, ethnolinguistic
 homogeneity, and more women in public office are correlated
 with higher shares of public spending on health; however,
 these findings are not robust and are sensitive to model
 specification. Evidence from case studies suggests that
 country-specific political economy considerations are key,
 and that results-focused reform efforts, in particular
 efforts to explicitly expand the breadth and depth of health
 coverage as opposed to efforts focused only on government
 budgetary targets, are more likely to result in sustained
 and politically-feasible prioritization of health from a
 fiscal space perspective.
  • Thumbnail

    Republic of Niger : 2012 Public Expenditure Review

    World Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-01-29)
    The Government's Plan for Economic
 and Social Development (PESD) 2012-2015 outlines an
 ambitious public expenditure program to foster sustainable
 inclusive growth and to improve public service delivery. The
 2012 Public Expenditure Review (PER) is the first in a
 planned series of annual PERs (APERs). The objective of
 APERs is to provide decision makers in the Nigerien
 government, domestic stakeholders, as well as Niger's
 development partners with regular information and analysis
 on budgetary developments. The APER process aims to meet
 information requirements of interested stakeholders while
 minimizing the transaction cost for government. In the
 absence of a regularly published APER, the authorities are
 confronted with frequent and often duplicative requests for
 information, which claim significant staff time in an
 already very capacity constrained public sector environment.
 It is envisaged that a "one assessment - one
 process" approach will help to reduce transaction costs
 for government while meeting information requirements of
 interested stakeholders. The APERs will consist of three
 main parts. The first part will monitor public expenditure
 performance and the implementation of public financial
 management reforms. The second part will focus on sectoral
 public expenditure issues, and the third part will analyze
 selected public expenditure issues in detail. In the context
 of the annual PER process, every second year a public
 expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA) will be
 carried out. Public expenditure management reform action
 plan has been adopted in 2012 and provides a road map for
 reforms and helps coordinate donor support in this area. The
 Bank is supporting the strengthening of public financial
 management systems through a technical assistance grant.
 This PER covers the following topics: introduction in the
 first chapter. The review's macroeconomic context in
 the second chapter, an assessment of public expenditure
 trends and composition in the third chapter, and a review of
 the volume, modalities, and allocation of official
 development assistance in the fourth chapter. Public
 expenditure developments in the health, education, and rural
 development sectors are reviewed in the fifth, sixth, and
 seventh chapters, respectively. At the end, chapter eight
 focuses on strengthening Niger's public expenditure
 review process.
  • Thumbnail

    Samoa Public Expenditure Review Notes : Taking Stock of Expenditure Trends from FY06-FY12

    World Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-05-12)
    Samoa's fiscal position and the
 structure of its budget have evolved markedly in recent
 years. Samoa had built up sufficient fiscal space in the
 early to mid-2000s to be able to respond to a major
 exogenous shock. The objective of the public expenditure
 review (PER) notes is to assist the Government of Samoa
 (GoS) in taking stock of the evolving expenditure trends in
 recent years and to strengthen the analytical basis for the
 management of public expenditure. Financial management
 information systems (FMIS) data was consistently classified
 and supplemented with project grant and loan related data
 from ministry of finance accounts to compile a full database
 of domestically and externally funded expenditure. The
 analysis of the public wage bill combines FMIS data with
 data from the payroll system. It also incorporates payroll
 data from the accounts of the largest public agencies to
 present approximate estimates of payroll trends for the
 whole government for the first time. This note will look
 backwards to take stock of the factors that accounted for
 fiscal expansion since FY2006, and look ahead to highlight
 the impact of cyclone Evan on the fiscal position from 2013
 onwards. The first part of the note will review trends in
 public expenditure, revenues, grants, financing, and budget
 execution to provide insight into which aspects resource
 allocation have changed the most in real terms from 2006 to
 2012, and decompose trends to identify the main drivers of
 growth in the budget. The second part of the note focuses on
 the impact of cyclone Evan on Samoa's fiscal position
 from 2013 onwards, and presents projections of the fiscal
 path in long-term in light of higher deficit and debt levels.
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.